SBIR/STTR Research Award

Determination of Micorcracking Damage in Composites

Award identifier 2923c85e02828f7783fd2cbcafe2f5d8e965ae1967d0e4cdde4cf21193ae026fAwarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$99,999

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2003

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
THERMAL WAVE IMAGING INC
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
ZWQCNHPJWHP6
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

Rapid growth in the performance and capabilities of pulsed thermography, and the increased use of composite materials in the construction and repair of military and commercial aircraft, has strongly positioned it as a viable NDI technique. Thistechnology, as it currently stands, is a widely accepted rapid, non-contact, wide-area inspection tool. In Phase I of this program, Thermal Wave Imaging, Inc. proposes to leverage its expertise in this field coupled with work performed under previouslyawarded SBIR programs. Specifically, we will investigate development of a nondestructive method to inspect composite skin honeycomb components for micro-cracking, heat damage, and other defects related to excessive thermal and/or moisture exposure. Twosignificant modifications to the conventional pulsed thermography approach will be investigated for feasibility: (1) A low-energy, repetitive data acquisition scheme will be evaluated for measurement of material properties and depth of low level damage,(2) A hardware device to reduce the duration of the flash lamp pulse by an order of magnitude will be built and tested. Successful development and implementation of the proposed NDI pulsed thermography system, for detecting and quantifying size and depthof micro-cracking in composite skin plies, will fill a wide-spread void in current capability for both commercial and military aerospace industry segments. Conventional NDI techniques such as UT, X-ray, PT have shown limited success for this particularneed, not to mention long inspection times, high cost of operation, health and safety issues, and inadequate portability.Our Phase I proposal was formulated based on input from current and prospective customers in Government and private aerospace manufacturing, service, and R&D, including Air Force, Navy, NASA, commercial airline, and military NDE personnel. We found thatseveral major aerospace and power generation customers (Boeing, Airbus, GKN Westland, Lockheed-Martin, Siemens Westinghouse, GE) were still using conventional inspection techniques such as UT, X-ray, and PT for detection of micro-cracking with moderatesuccess, not to mention long inspection times, high cost of operation, health and safety issues, and inadequate portability. These customers indicated a high degree of interest in an NDI system that would incorporate the advanced features of the pulsedsystems that they were using on other applications.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

19 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1997–2020). Reported award amounts total $7,516,118. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.