SBIR/STTR Research Award

Improved Orthopedic Implant Surface Coatings

Award identifier bb88b971e864fcb419b12783e9b5d16aeb83ef623fceafb99e79ea928ed38615Awarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$214,330

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2005

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
AFFINERGY, LLC
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
YJQ6K1QMS488
Solicitation number
PHS2005-2
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

Endosseous metallic implants are common alloplastic devices used in medicine and dentistry. The orthopedic and dental marketplace continues to grow and indications for implants are expanding. There is a perceived need to improve both the successful healing (osseointegration) and the long term outcome of implants by control of interfacial reactivity during healing and remodeling. The growth of knowledge of bone biology and the expansion of biotechnology permits the present consideration of specifying one or more interfacial biologic activities to an endosseous metallic implant by use of a natural or synthetic bioactive agent (growth factor, extracellular matrix protein, small molecule). Potential examples of relevant interfacial actions include osteoinduction specified by BMPs, inhibition of resorption specified by OPG, inhibition of inflammation TNFR antagonists, or prevention of infection by anti-microbial or anti-fouling molecules. Each interfacial action is of related significance to one or more endosseous metallic implant application used today. The main obstacle facing the direct specification of a biological activity or activities to an endosseous metallic implant surface is the attachment of the specifying agent to the metallic surface without compromising the underlying mechanical properties of the implant or the function of the specifying bioactive agent. In this proposal we present a novel approach for specifying the biologic activity of titanium implant surfaces. Affinergy has developed a generalized approach to creating target surface-specific biopolymers that irreversibly bind specifying bioactive agents to the endosseous implant surface. These specifying and grafting biopolymers are termed a "interfacial biomaterials" (IFBM). The bi-functional IFBM has the unique advantages of a) providing requisite surface binding specificity, b) comprising robust chemistry for broad-based applications and c) offering capacity to specify a wide range of associated or independent biological activities onto a single metallic surface. The goal of this phase I SBIR proposal is to validate the IFBM approach to specifying a biological activity to titanium endosseous implants. The results of this research will establish the foundation for direct translation of IFBM-modified endosseous implants to clinical applications.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

75 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2005–2023). Reported award amounts total $59,804,968. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.