SBIR/STTR Research Award

Low-Level Speciation of Cyanide in Waters

Award identifier 2dcfc7a88901197f1f390d9c81576c864101d43450409a45d79959c1a10e3f24Awarding agency Environmental Protection Agency

Award amount

$70,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2001

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Environmental Protection Agency
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
Frontier Geosciences Inc.
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
TKXSRGGCA2W6
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

Frontier Geosciences, Inc., proposes to develop a novel method for the speciation of a wide variety of different covalent and complex cyanides in waters, based on the coupling of a chromatographic separation to the most sensitive and selective cyanide detector that currently is available commercially. This type of method development specifically is requested by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) because the techniques currently available for cyanide speciation do not meet all the requirements of the EPA and the affected industries. Operationally defined techniques can only separate free from complexed cyanide, and generally are susceptible to matrix interferences, especially to false positive results. Conversely, the few available direct speciation techniques that separate different cyanide species chromatographically often use detectors that lack either sensitivity or specificity, resulting in limited applicability of the method (only in strongly contaminated environments) or in the lack of positive identification of a signal as one defined cyanide species. Frontier Geosciences, Inc., collaborates closely with the mining and petroleum industries and their regulatory counterparts in the areas of metal(loid) analysis, speciation, and geochemistry, and has experienced a very strong demand and need for direct, sensitive, specific, and accurate cyanide determination and speciation during the last few years. The anticipated solution for the problem investigated in this proposal consists of an ion chromatographic (IC) separation of the anionic cyanide species, coupled to an online UV-assisted wet chemical derivatization step that breaks down all cyanide species to free CN , which then is detected by a flow injection-gas diffusion-amperometric detection (FIGDAD) system. The final method would permit the separation and quantification of at least nine different cyanide species with detection limits of 1 ¿g/L per species. The Phase I objectives are to: (1) couple IC to FIGDAD and demonstrate a detection limit of 1 ¿g/L for CN- ; (2) develop the separation of nine relevant cyanide species; (3) demonstrate the feasibility of online UV-photolytic breakdown for [Fe(CN)6]3- and [Fe(CN)6]4- ; and (4) demonstrate feasibility of the method in real-world water samples and in alkaline leachates from cyanide-contaminated soils/sediments.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

11 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2000–2007). Reported award amounts total $914,859. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Environmental Protection Agency, Department of Energy

Agency intelligence

Environmental Protection Agency

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.