SBIR/STTR Research Award

Novel non-invasive device for treatment of elevated intracranial pressures

Award identifier c3d243f775de8a2006e3fe40778b0707655e3e312c5e009d8a2ad10c1d71e88cAwarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$153,176

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2006

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
ADVANCED CIRCULATORY SYSTEMS, INC.
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
Not reported
Solicitation number
PHS2006-2
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): Despite advances in the treatment of patients with shock and head injuries, the combination of traumatic brain injury and hemorrhagic shock is the leading cause of death and disability in children and adults in their most productive years. An estimated 1.6 million head injuries occur every year in the United States. The economic consequence of these grave injuries in terms of both lost productivity and the cost of medical care is estimated at over 100 billion dollars annually in the United States alone. While the last two decades of research has resulted in a greater understanding of the physiologic events leading to secondary neuronal injury following polytrauma, therapeutic advances are desperately needed. The goal of this Phase 1 SBIR application is to develop and evaluate a novel device, the intrathoracic pressure regulator (ITPR), intended to decrease the detrimental effects of secondary brain injury following traumatic head injury and shock. This SBIR application is based upon the discovery by the applicants that decreasing intrathoracic pressures with the ITPR lowers intracranial pressures while concurrently increasing cardiac output and blood pressure. The new device is inserted into a standard respiratory circuit between the patient and a means to ventilate the patient. It functions by decreasing a patient's intrathoracic pressure. The decrease in intrathoracic pressure creates a vacuum within the thorax relative to the rest of the body, thereby enhancing blood return to the heart while simultaneously decreasing intracranial pressures. This phase 1 investigation proposes to a) establish proof of concept that a novel intrathoracic pressure regulator valve is a useful and effective resuscitation technology in animals with elevated intracranial pressures and hemorrhagic shock, and b) add a custom variable rate vacuum regulator and prototype a display monitor for the intrathoracic pressure regulator (ITPR) system. If successful, Phase 2 studies will address the potential clinical efficacy of the ITPR in patients with polytrauma including traumatic brain injury. Traumatic brain injury affects hundreds of thousands of Americans each year, accounting for as many as 60,000 deaths and an estimated 70,000 to 90,000 patients with permanent neurologic disabilities. Use of the ITPR is expected to significantly improve patient outcomes, based upon the increase in blood flow to the heart and brain and the lowering of intracranial pressures observed in animal studies. If a significant clinical benefit is demonstrated, the ITPR could become a standard piece of equipment and treatment for patients with hemorrhagic shock and traumatic brain injury.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.