SBIR/STTR Research Award

New anti-complement therapy to reduce reperfusion injury

Award identifier 302901c909215b4869b14bdf184f9bd72f76dbcc6378ada10ae80f206b708e5eAwarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$122,978

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2005

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
ENDOPROTECH, INC.
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
TGWXNHCYTTR3
Solicitation number
PHS2005-2
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): The purpose of this proposal is to provide proof-of-concept that a novel therapy that prevents complement activation could be effective in reducing ischemia reperfusion injury (IRI) in transplanted organs. Complement activation after IRI in transplanted organs is a well-known phenomenon that may be responsible for delayed graft function and the hastening of acute rejection. The proposed therapy to reduce IRI is based on novel fusogenic lipid vesicles (FLVs) that rapidly incorporate into cell membranes. Our FLVs allow the rapid display of protective exogenous proteins on the surface of endothelial cells. The goal of this proposal is to optimize the display of a modified complement blocking protein named vaccinia virus complement control protein (VCP) on the surface of endothelial cells, and show that it can reduce complement induced damage after cells are exposed to hypoxia and reoxygenation. We hypothesize that the VCP displayed on the surface of endothelial cells will bind complement fragments early in the complement cascade and prevent cell injury. To test this hypothesis, we will perform the following specific aims. In Aim I, the formulation and concentration of biotinylated lipid vesicles will be optimized for optimal biotin coverage of cells. Aim II will assess on the surface of endothelial cells the biotin binding capacity of the streptavidin domain on our recently developed streptavidin-VCP (SA-VCP) chimeric protein. Aim III will assess the ability of SA-VCP to inhibit complement derived damage, after hypoxia and reoxygenation, of endothelial cells. If this proposal is successful it will demonstrate the effectiveness of both our novel cell membrane biotinylation platform technology and our newly developed anti-complement chimeric protein. In a Phase II proposal, we plan to test our technology in a transplantation animal model. We believe that our technology will make it possible to rapidly modify the functional characteristics of endothelial cell membranes without the use of gene therapy. If SA-VCP ex-vivo therapy is highly effective in preventing complement activation after IRI this will be extremely valuable for organ transplantation. The economic implications of our technologies for clinical application are vast.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

6 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2005–2018). Reported award amounts total $4,489,258. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase II, Phase I

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.