SBIR/STTR Research Award

Low Cost Reactive Barrier for Sites Contaminated with Radionuclides and Heavy Metals

Award identifier 560f767a5c82e947be1dcdf4f9381cd01ce2149306051b3bd88d55cfd92b90daAwarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$74,996

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

1998

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
ALTEX TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
LVHYQFMMY538
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

50445-98-I Low Cost Reactive Barrier for Sites Contaminated with Radionuclides and Heavy Metals--Altex Technologies Corporation, 650 Nuttman Street, Suite 114, Santa Clara, CA 95054-2620; (408) 982-2303 Dr. John Kelly, Principal Investigator Dr. Mehdi Namazian, Business Official DOE Grant No. DE-FG03-98ER82526 Amount: $74,996 The underground migration of toxic and radionuclide substances from contaminated sites threatens clean water resources. Permeable reactive barriers that surround a contaminated site are useful. However, costs for these barriers are high because of the high cost of adsorbents. Low cost adsorbents are needed to realize the full potential of reactive barriers. Low cost activated carbon (LCA), derived from wastes, has been identified as both effective and low cost. It is estimated that LCAC would be 45% lower in cost than commercial activated carbons. LCAC is a granulated activated carbon capable of adsorbing radionuclide and heavy metals in addition to a broad range of organic pollutants from water. A proprietary chemical surface treatment will be used to enhance LCAC adsorption of hydrocarbons and toxic metals from groundwater. Activated carbon with this surface treatment has shown excellent resistance to both leaching and carbonate fouling, important attributes for barrier applications. The objective of this project is to show the technical and economic feasibility of preparing the special adsorbent for use in reactive barrier configurations. Phase I will prepare the material and test its adsorption capability in a simulated barrier configuration. An economic analysis on material production will be combined with performance test data to show the technical and economic feasibility of the product. In Phase II, a reactive barrier for soils will be prepared and tested. Commercial Applications and Other Benefits as described by the awardee: The multi-layer permeable reactive barrier should provide a flexible and cost effective in-situ ground water remediation technology for contaminated sites. Tens of millions of pounds of this material could be produced each year. Due to the estimated 45% lower cost for this material, cleanup costs would be reduced substantially._

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

117 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1988–2025). Reported award amounts total $33,304,403. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Energy, Environmental Protection Agency, Department of Agriculture, National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.