SBIR/STTR Research Award

Rapid Test Kit for Quantifying Hormonal Activity in Animal Feeding Operation Wastewater

Award identifier 07e52b197bcbd0e5b4a4fa68336320a83fafae74565100414512ccd160c7d09dAwarding agency Environmental Protection Agency

Award amount

$70,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2007

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Environmental Protection Agency
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
Fort Environmental Laboratories, Inc.
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
Not reported
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

Passage in 1996 of the Food Quality Protection Act (FQPA) and Amendments to the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDW) reflected these concerns and required EPA to develop a screening program, using appropriate validation test systems and other scientifically relevant information, to determine whether certain substances may have an endocrine effect in wildlife and humans. The proposed work will result in the development of an assay which tests for hormonal substances which are capable of altering development and reproductive processes in aquatic animals exposed to waste run-off from animal feed operations (AFOs). This proposal incorporates recommendations of previous reviewers to: 1) expound on the predictability of the model and determine the propensity of false positive and false negative responses, 2) evaluate the potential for interactive effects in complex wastewaters from the AFOs, 3) demonstrate the quantitative nature of the model in relation to potential regulations of wastewater from AFOs, and 4) demonstrate the link between proposed Phase I and II activities. The primary goal of the proposed research is to develop and commercialize a rapid and cost-effective test kit to measure contaminants released in to surface waters and ground water from animal feeding operations. Specifically, we will develop a 24-h test model for evaluating the toxicological activity of the waste run-off from animal feeding operations by monitoring the hormonally induced process of oocyte maturation in X. laevis oocytes in vitro. Evaluation will entail testing neat chemicals with known activities to evaluate the potential for false positive and negative responses, complex wastewater mixtures wastewater samples collected from AFOs, and complex mixtures from AFOs spiked with EDCs. The complex wastewater mixture from the AFOs will be evaluated with and without the standard additions of known EDCS to evaluate the potential for additive, non-interactive responses and interactive responses including synergism and antagonism using a binary mixture model. Inhibition of GVBD will be evaluated relative to the classical inhibition ethinyl estradiol to establish a quantitivative measure of estrogen equivalents. When GVBD stimulation or inhibition is detected, complementary progesterone and androgen receptor binding assay will be performed to determine if the effect is the result of receptor binding. The successful completion of the proposed technology will provide the scientific and regulatory community with an ecologically-relevant, rapid means of evaluating the toxicological effects of pharmaceuticals and hormones contained released to the environment from animal feed operations.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Agency intelligence

Environmental Protection Agency

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.