SBIR/STTR Research Award

Yersinia membrane proteins as vaccine candidates

Award identifier 0dd1e5cebd7d1d1d85c851dda60ed5e5b2f89fd6873f72c1379cbfd8e525f3c0Awarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$225,108

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2007

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
SYNTIRON, LLC
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
UHMHX5UCKCM5
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): Yersinia pestis is the causative agent of plague, a severe acute illness that is relatively rare in the United States today. However, there is concern that Y. pestis will be utilized as a bioweapon due to its ability to cause high mortality in an unprotected population. Since currently there are no available human vaccines that effectively prevent Y. pestis infections, there is a critical unmet need for the identification of protective immunogens against this pathogen. Preliminary studies and investigations have led us to hypothesize that vaccination with membrane proteins derived from Y. pestis grown under conditions that mimic in vivo growth will protect against subsequent infection and mortality. To test this hypothesis, and work towards our overall goal of developing safe and effective vaccines against Y. pestis infection in humans, we hereby propose Phase I studies with three specific aims: In Aim 1, we will compare the protective efficacy of membrane proteins derived from Y. pestis grown at 37xC in iron-limiting and iron-rich conditions in mouse models of bubonic and pneumonic plague; in Aim 2, we will separate the proteins within the composition providing the best protection in Aim 1, test the resulting fractions for reactivity to serum obtained from immunized mice, and identify proteins within sero-reactive fractions; and in Aim 3, we will combine sero-reactive fractions into vaccines and test their efficacy in mouse models to determine which proteins contribute to protection against plague. Taken together, we believe that the proposed investigations will provide key information about specific antigens that may be used for the development of an effective vaccine for the prevention of Y. pestis infections. Yersinia pestis is the causative agent of plague, a serious and potentially fatal infection that is relatively rare in the United States today. However, the intentional use of Y. pestis as a bioweapon would inflict a high mortality rate in an unprotected population, and there are currently no available vaccines for the effective prevention of plague. In the proposed studies, we plan to identify protective antigens as an initial step towards our overall strategy for developing vaccines for the prevention of human plague.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

6 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2006–2015). Reported award amounts total $2,209,500. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.