SBIR/STTR Research Award

NanoActive¿ Materials: Unique Sorbents for Perchlorte Removal from Water

Award identifier 20f269fddef59010b5ab7c3a2ba237d414435611768ce062c0c25ce0ffb37f2cAwarding agency Environmental Protection Agency

Award amount

$70,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2005

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Environmental Protection Agency
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
NanoScale Materials, Inc.
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
K2MGCFK6SAE9
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

Perchlorate (ClO4) contamination of ground and surface waters has placed drinking water supplies at risk in communities through out the U.S. Perchlorte is a human health concern at high doses due to its capability to interfere with iodine uptake and the ability of the thyroid to requlate hormone production and metabolism. Health risks at lower doses are not well understood and EPA studies are continuing to determine safe levels in drinking water. Due to perchlorate anion's fundamental physical and chemical nature, the contamination is difficult to treat. The objective of this proposal is to develop sorbents based on NanoActive¿ materials for destructive adsorptive removal of perchlorate ions from contaminated water. It is anticipated that the low capacity and/or slow kinetics of conventional sorbents towards perchlorte anions can be considerably improved by employ8ing unique NanoActive¿ materials as sorbents. In order to meet the stated objective, NanoScale proposed to investigate NanoActive¿ TiO2 and its derivatives as adsorbents for removal of perhlorate from contaminated water. NanoActive¿ materials should provide a substantial advantage over other conventional adsorbents since they possess the desired adsorbent characteristics such as high surface area, larfe pore size volume, as well as numerous defect sites, which lead to unique surface properties that can enhance their adsorptive capabilities. The proposed work is divided into five tasks: (1) Investigation of NanoActive¿ TiO2 for removal of perchlorate from contaminated water; (2) Preparation and characterization of Fe(II) incorporated NanoActive¿ TiO2; (3) Investigation of adsorption capabilities of modified NanoActive¿ materials; (4) Preliminary column adsorption experiments with promising materails; and (5) Preliminary economic and production scale-up studies to estimate overfall cost for utilization of nanoparticle-based perchlortae adsorbent. Phase II research will be tested under "real life" conditions by introducing competing ions, typical temperature ranges and realistic flow rates. NanoScale's goal is to develop novel, highly effective adsorbent materials for POU/POE filters.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

55 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1995–2012). Reported award amounts total $12,769,496. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, Environmental Protection Agency, Department of Health and Human Services, National Science Foundation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Energy

Agency intelligence

Environmental Protection Agency

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.