SBIR/STTR Research Award

Managing Environmental Risks in Pregnancy

Award identifier 711577a65926e261a58ddd95019a74690d7ba2c4bfed34f131c80e5be94dbd70Awarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$126,046

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2006

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
VIDA HEALTH COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
Not reported
Solicitation number
PHS2006-2
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): Environmental toxicants are increasingly linked to adverse birth outcomes such as low birth weight, preterm birth, birth defects and developmental delays. Inner-city populations are at high risk for adverse birth outcomes and also are more likely to be exposed to environmental toxicants. The Institute of Medicine and the National Environmental Education and Training Foundation recommend the integration of environmental health concepts into all levels of medical and nursing education. In the proposed SBIR project, Vida Health Communications, Inc. will produce, evaluate and distribute a multimedia package called "Managing Environmental Risks in Pregnancy". Drawing on the proven and specific advantages of DVD and web technologies, the media programs will teach about the health advantages of screening, assessing and mitigating potential exposure to known and suspected teratogens and environmental toxicants that pose a risk to the developing fetus. The package of educational visual media, web and print resources will consist of (1) training programs for prenatal health care providers who serve pregnant women who live in urban settings, (2) educational programs for pregnant women who live in urban settings, many of whom have low literacy and/or are of minority ethnicity, and (3) an electronic library of materials for providers to print and distribute to patients. In Phase I, the producers will develop both the patient education and clinical training curricula and produce prototypes of the media, which will then be evaluated using focus groups representative of the target audiences. Evaluators will use well-documented qualitative techniques to analyze focus group data. This project will advance the environmental health training of prenatal care providers serving women at risk for exposure to substances that can harm their developing fetus. It will also provide much needed education, at appropriate literacy levels, for at-risk women about ways that they can reduce fetal exposure to environmental hazards. Relevance to Public Health: We are just beginning to recognize the scope of teratogens that pregnant women may be exposed to living in urban environments. Given the rapid development of a fetus, especially in the early months of pregnancy, avoidance of exposure is at present the most effective way to mitigate potential harm. This research will contribute to knowledge of how prenatal care providers can interest, inform and motivate pregnant women who likely bear the greatest risk of exposure, so they can protect the fetus and improve the chance of giving birth to a healthy, normal infant.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.