SBIR/STTR Research Award

Portable pneumatic driver for counterpulsation therapy

Award identifier dbc294e0f941ce177e0ca099be692454a9c8c5d203f701917eb2f82b13236ccfAwarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$268,790

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2007

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
SCR, INC.
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
Not reported
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): The incidence of congestive heart failure (CHF) is increasing worldwide with over one million new cases diagnosed annually. Over the past 30 years, counterpulsation with an intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) has been widely and successfully used as a short-term treatment for cardiac dysfunction. However, counterpulsation is limited by its location within the descending thoracic aorta to short durations of therapy, typically less than 14 days. To overcome this limitation, Superficial Counterpulsation Research (SCR), Inc. has invented a novel system for extended application of counterpulsation therapy for heart failure. The system consists of a 32-ml counterpulsation device (CPD) that is designed to be implanted via a surface operation in the shoulder area (pacemaker pocket). The CPD, a blood sac, is anastamosed to the subclavian artery. A driver for controlling device inflation/deflation timing carried externally allowing complete patient mobility. Preliminary testing with a first generation prototype driver was conducted in mock circulation system and acute animal experiments to define driver performance characteristics. The driver was then re-designed to reduce size and weight, improve force of counterpulsation delivery, increase response to higher heart rates, and extend device longevity. The CPD driver is in fabrication and ready for in vivo testing. The goal of this Phase I SBIR proposal is to compare the hemodynamic efficacy of the 32-ml CPD system (device and driver) to a 40- ml IABP system (catheter and driver). We will also demonstrate that engineering specifications of the new driver are met. This will be accomplished by completing the following specific aim: Aim-1: To demonstrate the efficacy of a 32-ml CPD driver in reducing ventricular afterload and augmenting diastolic perfusion to the heart and vasculature under a variety of clinically-relevant conditions - hypertension, hypotension, and heart failure. Our hypothesis is that the performance of the CPD system will be similar to a standard clinically-available IABP system. If successful, in Phase II we will conduct driver reliability testing controller reliability testing and chronic in vivo testing to demonstrate the long-term effectiveness of the 32-ml CPD system. SCR, Inc. (Louisville, KY) is developing a novel mechanical device to treat early stage heart failure patients. The device can be implanted using a simple surgical procedure comparable to a pacemaker. Since comparable devices can only provide up to 2 weeks of support, SCR is proposing to develop a portable, pneumatic driver to provide up to two years of support.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.