SBIR/STTR Research Award

Growth Factor Coated Sutures for Improved Tendons Repair

Award identifier 0c766adfebb40a75c77b5a5970e597d0f4201c62a96136ee03772393ba72a85eAwarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$202,997

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2006

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
AFFINERGY, LLC
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
YJQ6K1QMS488
Solicitation number
PHS2006-2
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): Tendon injuries are quite common and the frequency of these injuries is expected to rise as the population ages, yet continues to remain active. Long periods of immobilization and rehabilitation are required because tendon healing is a relatively slow process. Innovations that can shorten this time period by improving healing rates and increasing the strength of repair tissue will be of great value for patients and society. Earlier activity is believed to promote better return of function, accelerated healing, and improved quality of tendon repair tissue. However, this early motion and activity cannot be at the cost of increasing gapping of the two tendon ends or even frank re-rupture. Attempts have been made with ultrasound, mechanical stimulation, and growth factors to increase healing rates to provide enough mechanical strength to allow patients to start activity that will put load on the healing tendons, while still protecting the integrity of the initial suture repair. The goal of this Phase I SBIR proposal is to validate an IFBM approach to bind bioactive molecules such as growth factors to non-absorbable polyester suture (Ethibond, Ethicon, Inc.), which is commonly used in many types of tendon repair. We present a novel approach to create target-specific modular peptides that bind bioactive agents (growth factors, cells, etc.) to synthetic biocompatible surfaces (matrix polymer, metal, etc.). These specifying and grafting biopolymers are termed "interfacial biomaterials" (IFBMs). A bi-functional IFBM has the unique advantages of a) providing requisite surface binding specificity, b) comprising robust chemistry for broad-based applications and c) offering capacity to specify a wide range of associated or independent biological activities onto a single scaffold or surface. Cartilage derived morphogenetic proteins (CDMP) -1, -2 and -3 (also known as BMP -14, -13, and -12) have recently been shown to be involved in tendon development and healing. We believe that binding growth factors such as those of the CDMP family to suture with IFBM technology could significantly improve the clinical outcomes after surgical repair of tendons by increasing healing rates and by improving the quality of the repair tissue.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

75 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2005–2023). Reported award amounts total $59,804,968. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.