SBIR/STTR Research Award

Phase II of VerOFy: A New Tool to Improve Productivity for Stress Research

Award identifier 4597a90d8957832f7e8e1f7b813715e96410da52260649b85c92472733b53872Awarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$288,692

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2013

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
PRESAGE BIOSCIENCES, INC.
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
QG6LWDZ313H9
Solicitation number
PA12-088
Topic code
NCI

Research abstract

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): With few exceptions, extensive characterization of signal pathway alterations in cancer, and advances in our capacity to identify potent modulators of distinct molecular targets, has not translated into breakthrough drugs. In a recent New York Times article (Nov. 14, 2009), Mervyn Turner, Chief Strategy Officer for Merck was quoted: We invest far too long in bad ideas. It is really important to stop that at an earlier stage in the cycle . This is particularly evidentin cancer drug development where over 90% of new anti-cancer drugs fail in the clinic. Our experiences in this area lead us to believe that one reason fo this problem is the lack of an efficient, clinically predictive platform for validating hypotheses ndmaking program advancement decisions at the earliest stages of the drug development process. Current in vivo models are resource intensive and rate limiting. Furthermore, current in vivo drug efficacy testing requires substantial investment in chemistry tooptimize compounds for systemic delivery. Thus the majority of early drug development is heavily dependent on in vitro tumor cell models most of which are grown under conditions, such as in serum, which do not represent the native tumor environment. It iswell accepted that these models do not reliably predict clinical efficacy. A second fundamental issue is that almost all tumors acquire resistance to single agent targeted therapies by rewiring signaling networks to reestablish effective oncogenic output.Proactive and rapid identification of alternative druggable pathway nodes would enable a shift in focus from developing drugs that target specific molecules to devising strategies to shut down oncogenic networks. To address these issues, we are developingan end-to-end platform that enables comprehensive functional interrogation of cancer pathways of interest to drug developers, compatible with rapid validation of findings in vivo co-clinical model at the earliest stages of cancer drug development. In Aim1, we will employ a gene trap vector to generate tumor models that emit light only upon specific inhibition of key oncogenic pathway nodes. In Aim 2, we will use our porous needle array technology to demonstrate capacity to test, compare, and validate multiple agents, in the context of a single tumor grown in vivo, for anti-pathway and anti-tumor efficacy. Drs. Klinghoffer and Olson (Presage Biosciences Inc., and the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center), who developed the porous needle array technology,have joined forces with Dr. Finney (Xactagen LLC), whose optimized gene trap vector system permits capture of pathway modulation via endogenous gene regulation with sensitivity amenable to in vivo analysis. Successful coupling of the porous needle array with high fidelity, high sensitivity gene trap derived oncogene pathway reporters will facilitate a paradigm shift from the current heavy reliance on standard in vitro based models early in the drug discovery process to more predictive and disease relevant in vivo models. Our platform will improve rational advancement of drug development projects, and in doing so, will increase the clinical success rate of new treatments that improve the health of cancer patients. PUBLIC HEALTH RELEVANCE PUBLIC HEALTH RELEVANCE: The top 20 oncology companies spend over 14B per year on new oncology drug development yet over 90% of new anti-cancer drugs fail in clinical trials. We believe that this failure rate is unacceptable and is due to 1) an over reliance on testing new compounds and hypotheses in models that do not represent cancers seen in the clinic and 2) focus on inhibiting specific molecular targets instead of shutting down entire cancer pathways. The expected outcome of our proposal is that our drug development partners would be provided with an advanced platform for making better program advancement decisions early in the development process and this will increase the rational promotion of projects with the best chance to improve the well-being of patientsin need of novel life-saving medicines.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

4 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2010–2016). Reported award amounts total $4,663,376. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase II, Phase I

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.