SBIR/STTR Research Award

Interactive Server Training for Fetal Alcohol Prevention

Award identifier c8bf503dc978ac2f869b4e77829a1e1234d7f11ea54007a71f2b1cafcdb9e4bcAwarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$788,740

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2005

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
DESCHUTES RESEARCH, INC.
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
Not reported
Solicitation number
PHS2005-2
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): Fetal Alcohol Syndrome is the leading preventable cause of developmental disabilities in the Western world, but some 20 percent of American women and 40 percent of the heavy drinkers among them continue to consume alcohol during pregnancy. Efforts thus far at prevention have employed "universal" methods such as warning labels on alcoholic beverage containers and information or screening in prenatal health care settings. However, high-risk drinkers tend to seek prenatal care late in pregnancy and are often unpersuaded by perfunctory warning labels, failing to recognize or fully appreciate the serious and unpredictable risks of prenatal alcohol exposure. A venue frequently visited by this high-risk population is the public drinking establishment. A high percent of this population have favorite bars they visit regularly, positioning their familiar bartenders and servers to function as credible and potentially effective prevention and early intervention agents by distributing verbal and written information and friendly encouragement to their customers. On occasion a visibly pregnant woman orders alcohol, an event disturbing to servers and one with which they are usually unprepared to deal diplomatically. Previous NIAAA-supported projects have identified a high level of interest and receptivity to this training within the alcohol service industry. This Phase II program will improve and expand our Phase I prototype for comprehensive FASD prevention training for alcohol servers and managers, which has been well received by test subjects and has produced significant increases in knowledge and confidence. Live trainings of alcohol servers and managers incorporating this same content in a NIAAA-supported project have produced large effect sizes in subsequent "pseudopatron" tests. Phase II will include an enlarged sample of video models in a range of alcohol-serving environments with diverse customers and customer responses, as requested by many test subjects, and will develop a companion website providing the more detailed medical and legal information in which many of our test subjects also expressed interest. The Web site will be regularly updated with new medical findings or changes in legislation and case law, and will provide local treatment resources for alcohol treatment referrals. The program will be evaluated in 60 bars in two states, employing a quasi-experimental, pre-post design with controls, using survey measures of knowledge, attitudes, self-efficacy, and reported and anticipated behavior, and observed behavior in response to pregnant-appearing pseudopatrons.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.