SBIR/STTR Research Award

Novel Metal Shaping Process Using Non-Toxic Working Fluids

Award identifier 74f706af66ef65cbb024d6ce258cd197883c1c26a3fbb8acaa7b55ceb365358fAwarding agency Environmental Protection Agency

Award amount

$69,882

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2005

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Environmental Protection Agency
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
Faraday Technology, Inc.
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
ZL5LDDLNHGN4
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

This SBIR proposal addresses worker and environmental safety concerns regarding the use of toxic cutting fluids in metal shaping operations. The toxicity of cutting fluids cn be caused by either the constituents fo the cutting fluid chemistyr or in the case of water-soluble emulsions, the toxicity can be caused by biocides intended to control baterial growth. This proposal seeks to adapt an advenced electrochemical edge and surface finishing technology to provide a robust, cost effective, high volume metal removal process that does not require toxic chemicals. It addresses the common challenges associated with electrochemical processing, namely dimensional control and surface finish, by applying a user-defined, pulsed electric field to control the metal dissolution patterns as opposed to relying on chemical means. Furthermore, the electrolytes employed in this process do not foster bacterial growth and thereby eliminated the need for toxic biocides. In addition to eliminating the need to toxic cutting fluids, the proposed technology will provide the following advantages over conventional machining processes: (1) can machine comples geometries in a single pass, (2) can provide excellent surface finished, and (3) results in a burr free an stress free surface. To complete the life cycle assessment of the process, the metal waste can be removed from the electrolyte using both physical and electrochemical means, providing an enriched material for reuse programs. The effluent from this filtration step is introduced back into the circulation loop. The anticipated results of the Phase I and II efforts are (1) the development and commercialization of an electrochemical technology that can machine metals, such as carbon steel, in the presence of non-toxic electrolytes, (2) the development of an electrolyte managemetn strategy, and (3) the development of a metal reclamation strategy. The proposed electrochemical technology will be applicable to a wide range of etals for the automotive, military and commercial aircraft, and general industries. The advantages of this technology will be most prominent in components that have complex geometry and/or require excellent surface finishes.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

202 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1994–2025). Reported award amounts total $72,052,120. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Energy, Environmental Protection Agency, National Science Foundation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Health and Human Services

Agency intelligence

Environmental Protection Agency

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.