SBIR/STTR Research Award

COMPUTER-ASSISTED SMOKING CESSATION FOR HEAVY SMOKERS

Award identifier a315450f0dba8a03bf15cd6e11aa2603eff2076765ba30febefab3685c26eaacAwarding agency Department of Health and Human Services

Award amount

$49,009

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

1991

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
Health Innovations Inc
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
Not reported
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

RECENT DATA FROM EPIDEMIOLOGICAL SURVEYS, REVIEWS OF EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES, AS WELL AS RESEARCH CONDUCTED BY HEALTH INNOVATIONS, SUGGEST THAT SELF-HELP SMOKING CESSATIONPROGRAMS ARE LESS SUCCESSFUL FOR HEAVY SMOKERS THAN FOR THEIR LIGHTER SMOKING COUNTERPARTS. UNFORTUNATELY, THERE ARE CURRENTLY NO BEHAVIORAL TREATMENTS THAT PROVIDE DIFFERENTIAL RECOMMENDATIONS ON THE BASIS OF DEGREE OF NICOTINE DEPENDENCE. THERE IS, THEREFORE, A NEED FOR TREATMENT PROGRAMS THAT MEET THE SPECIAL NEEDS OF HEAVY SMOKERS. THE LIFESIGN COMPUTER ASSISTED SMOKING TREATMENT PROGRAM PROVIDES A STRUCTURED, GRADUAL WITHDRAWAL PROGRAM THAT HAS PROVEN TO BE AN EFFECTIVE AND COMMERCIALLY VIABLE SMOKING CESSATION PROGRAM. ONE STRENGTH OF COMPUTER ASSISTED PROGRAMS IS THAT THEY ALLOW FOR PRECISE QUANTIFICATION OF TREATMENT PARAMETERS AND ARE THUS READILY AMENABLE TO MODIFICATION AND EXPERIMENTAL TESTING OF THEIR IMPACT. WE WILL PERFORM MODIFICATIONS TO THE LIFESIGN PROGRAM THAT ARE LIKELY TO IMPROVE OUTCOME RATES WITH HEAVY SMOKERS. MODIFICATIONS OF THE PROGRAM INCLUDE CHANGES IN LENGTH AND RATE OF THE WITHDRAWAL CURVE AND A USER INTERFACE TO FURTHERALTER THE PACE OF WITHDRAWAL. A SMALL-SCALE OUTCOME TRIAL COMPARING THE MODIFIED PROGRAM WITH THE ORIGINAL LIFESIGN PROGRAM WILL ALLOW US TO ASSESS THE IMPACT OF THE MODIFICATIONS AND TO MAKE FINAL PROGRAM CHANGES IN FOR SOLICITATION OF PHASE II FUNDING FOR A LARGE-SCALE EFFICACY TRIAL. RECENT DATA FROM EPIDEMIOLOGICAL SURVEYS, REVIEWS OF EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES, AS WELL AS RESEARCH CONDUCTED BY HEALTH INNOVATIONS, SUGGEST THAT SELF-HELP SMOKING CESSATIONPROGRAMS ARE LESS SUCCESSFUL FOR HEAVY SMOKERS THAN FOR THEIR LIGHTER SMOKING COUNTERPARTS. UNFORTUNATELY, THERE ARE CURRENTLY NO BEHAVIORAL TREATMENTS THAT PROVIDE DIFFERENTIAL RECOMMENDATIONS ON THE BASIS OF DEGREE OF NICOTINE DEPENDENCE. THERE IS, THEREFORE, A NEED FOR TREATMENT PROGRAMS THAT MEET THE SPECIAL NEEDS OF HEAVY SMOKERS. THE LIFESIGN COMPUTER ASSISTED SMOKING TREATMENT PROGRAM PROVIDES A STRUCTURED, GRADUAL WITHDRAWAL PROGRAM THAT HAS PROVEN TO BE AN EFFECTIVE AND COMMERCIALLY VIABLE SMOKING CESSATION PROGRAM. ONE STRENGTH OF COMPUTER ASSISTED PROGRAMS IS THAT THEY ALLOW FOR PRECISE QUANTIFICATION OF TREATMENT PARAMETERS AND ARE THUS READILY AMENABLE TO MODIFICATION AND EXPERIMENTAL TESTING OF THEIR IMPACT. WE WILL PERFORM MODIFICATIONS TO THE LIFESIGN PROGRAM THAT ARE LIKELY TO IMPROVE OUTCOME RATES WITH HEAVY SMOKERS. MODIFICATIONS OF THE PROGRAM INCLUDE CHANGES IN LENGTH AND RATE OF THE WITHDRAWAL CURVE AND A USER INTERFACE TO FURTHERALTER THE PACE OF WITHDRAWAL. A SMALL-SCALE OUTCOME TRIAL COMPARING THE MODIFIED PROGRAM WITH THE ORIGINAL LIFESIGN PROGRAM WILL ALLOW US TO ASSESS THE IMPACT OF THE MODIFICATIONS AND TO MAKE FINAL PROGRAM CHANGES IN FOR SOLICITATION OF PHASE II FUNDING FOR A LARGE-SCALE EFFICACY TRIAL.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.