SBIR/STTR Research Award

Anabolic Therapeutics for Increasing Bone Denisty and Quality

Award identifier dfcd8e5acbb9f9fd45cdbaad60bcea59122f2ee90dfca512f32ca324a8a7cd2fAwarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$994,943

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2008

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
OsteoGeneX Inc
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
Not reported
Solicitation number
PHS2007-2
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): OsteoGeneX is developing a therapeutic directed against the new bone target Sclerostin (SOST) for the treatment of osteoporosis and related bone disorders. Through genomic approaches Sclerostin was identified as a mast er regulator of bone mass affecting men and women. Using proteomic approaches Dr. Ellies and Krumlauf discovered and patented Sclerostin's mechanism of action. Since then, Dr. Ellies was awarded an NIH Phase I SBIR proof of concept grant to screen for co mpounds that would block SOST function. This library was hand picked by Dr. Gunda Georg, University Distinguished Professor of Medicinal Chemistry, University of Kansas. The NIH has identified Dr. Georg as one of the top 5 percent of researchers receiving funding from the NIH for her work in medicinal chemistry and drug development and discovery. Dr. Ellies has identified many lead candidates that work to block SOST. These candidates need to be authenticated using a novel biochemical approach looking speci fically at the binding of SOST to its receptor - LRP5. The binding of these proteins is what regulates new bone formation. Recent news about bone building therapeutics - PTH and analogs - having to carry a black box warning has created a need for a new bon e building therapeutic. An alternative to PTH therapy is through the use of Sclerostin as an ideal anabolic target for drug development. The purpose of this SBIR Phase II application is to identify the most optimal dosing of a single or couple of authentic ated lead candidates that will build new bone. To accomplish this end, we propose to carry out the following specific aims; authenticate positive lead candidates; calculate effective dosage and delivery; and analyze their effect in rat models for osteoporo sis. PUBLIC HEALTH RELEVANCE: Osteoporosis is one of the most prevalent problems in our society. New drug targets for controlling bone deposition must be identified, as our understanding of the molecular control of bone deposition is poor. While there is no cure for osteoporosis, the FDA has approved the use of certain drugs to prevent and treat osteoporosis. These drugs, especially those directed against bone resorption, cause undesirable side effects and may not significantly reduce fracture risk in the target populations. Thus, there is a critical need to identify new and better therapeutics that would result in better patient outcomes. This proposal is aimed at authenticating novel drugs that increase bone deposition, rather than prevent resorption, to offset the bone loss of osteoporosis. Furthermore, this proposal will establish a dosage regime and delivery, and show proof of concept in animals.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.