SBIR/STTR Research Award

An Artificial Myocardium for Pediatric Support

Award identifier 69115aa69d1f5d6701d2161cca516fe172d5a26c9d9acdbcdd032067527ae462Awarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$799,935

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2006

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
ABIOMED, INC.
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
KBGSE7HJSDE3
Solicitation number
PHS2006-2
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): The ultimate objective of this proposed program is the commercialization of a neonate ventricular assist device (VAD). Although VADs, both implantable and paracorporeal, have become an important surgical option for adult patients with myocardial failure unresponsive to less aggressive therapy, no VADs are commercially available for short-term use in small infants who are critically ill with heart failure. This is in spite of the fact that most cases for cardiac support via extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) are for infants following complex surgical reconstructions for congenital defects. An aggressive development schedule for a pediatric VAD is proposed. The necessary characterization of the VAD will be completed for a submission to the FDA for approval as a humanitarian use device (HUD). The clinical indication sought for the device will be for short-term use to bridge to recovery following complex surgical reconstruction for congenital defects. Specifically, the target population is neonates with a single functional ventricle anatomy undergoing life saving surgery. A significant fraction of these patients either have difficulty weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass, or have cardiac failure after coming off bypass requiring the use of high levels of inotropes. The VAD is a pericardial wrap that contracts around the ventricle to provide cardiac support. The use of a short term, minimally invasive VAD should have a major benefit for these weakened patients. The device developed here will be implanted either at the time of surgery, or on an emergent basis for cardiac rescue and assist. The device developed will fill a large hole in the current public health care system. Pediatric VADs for the neonate population are neither currently available nor being developed for clinical use, despite this patient population having the highest need. The current technology used for this patient population, ECMO has an associated high morbidity. Funding the development of the neonate VAD will follow recent federal guidelines related to orphan product development of necessary medical devices with relatively small market potential. ABIOMED, as a leader in cardiac assist, will provide the technical expertise to develop the needed device.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

63 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1983–2011). Reported award amounts total $17,365,096. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Defense

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.