SBIR/STTR Research Award

PROCESS ENGINEERING HIV-BASED RECOMBINANT MVA VACCINE

Award identifier f90f768e5afaa2f4524e1512eb2f06ebd7f70662f75e11dbfb1ebe39f47b7e74Awarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$100,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2002

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
GEOVAX, INC.
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
CEF5ULT44LF5
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): Development of process optimization for production of the recombinant modified vaccinia Ankara (rMVA) virus booster component of a novel multiprotein-expressing DNA/rMVA HIV vaccine candidate is proposed. In preclinical trials in macaques, DNA priming and rMVA boosting with Gag-Pol-Env-expressing immunogen for a chimera of simian and human immunodeficiency viruses (SHIV) has successfully controlled a highly pathogenic SHIV-89.6p challenge administered by the mucosal route at 7 months after the last immunization (Science 292:69). Clade B Gag-Pol-Env DNAs and rMVAs have been constructed in the laboratories of Dr. Harriet Robinson (Emory) and Dr. Bernard Moss (NIAID). These will be entering phase I trials sponsored by the NIAID HIV Vaccine Trials Network in early 2002. A major problem in preparing reagents for phase I trials was GMP production of the rMVA. Given the success of the multiprotein DNA/rMVA vaccine in preclinical models, the Emory Vaccine Center and Emory University helped start GeoVax, Inc., a company whose initial goal is the translation of the DNA/rMVA HIV-1 vaccine for human use. The overall goal of this proposal is to undertake the process engineering for GMP production of future lots of rMVA such that the vaccine used in phase III trials will have been produced under conditions that will support cost effective production of a licensed vaccine. The clade B Gag-Pol-Env rMVA grows well under standard laboratory conditions to titers as high as lxl0E10 pfu per 850 cm2 roller bottle. During GMP production for phase I trials, the best titers achieved were about 3x10E9 pfu per 850 cm2 roller bottle. The primary goal of this proposal is to achieve scale-up conditions that produce titers of at least lxl0E10 pfu and hopefully lxl0E11 pfu of rMVA per 850 cm2 roller bottle equivalent. The rMVA grows best on primary chick embryo fibroblast cells (CEF). Development of conditions for efficient large-scale production will use a novel scale-up methodology for CEF growth and virus production coupled with a logical design for growth optimization. CEF-derived vaccines have a long history for human use with a number of products approved and millions of doses administered. Our goal is to increase rMVA titers to lxl0E10 - lxl0E11 per 850 cm2 roller bottle equivalent to provide a safe and cost effective product to meet the global need for an HIV-1 vaccine.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

7 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2002–2021). Reported award amounts total $3,858,316. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.