SBIR/STTR Research Award

Promoting Evaluation/Teaching/Research on AIDS (PETRA)

Award identifier b9bdec086428870a26815cdaf07a8f86aea904e8c27049d991d06c5db55d5698Awarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$0

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2003

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
Sociometrics Corporation
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
KGL3NCTHEM88
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

The proposed project will develop a set of three interrelated research-based products: (1) an archive of exemplary behavioral and social research data on HIV/AIDS, (2) HIV/AIDS teaching modules for the university classroom, and (3) a Web-based learning center for promoting best practices in HIV/AIDS prevention program development and evaluation. These resources should facilitate progress toward the HIV/AIDS-related prevention and control objectives of Healthy People 2010 by: (1) fostering efficient dissemination of high-quality research data and conclusions on behavioral and social factors related to HIV/AIDS; (2) empowering students and educators from a variety of disciplines at the undergraduate and graduate levels to understand, communicate, and utilize research data on social aspects of HIV/AIDS; and (3) enabling prevention practitioners to perform program development as well as process and outcome evaluation tasks critical to achieving best practices standards, thus helping to bridge the gap between research and practice. The three research-based products are interrelated, allowing them to be developed more efficiently and cost-effectively through combined project work. Because each product has a different target audience, the overall impact of this project will be felt across a broad range of HIV/AIDS-related fields. Input from a Scientist Expert Panel and from professors in a variety of disciplines will help ensure the scientific merit and substantive utility of the data archive and teaching modules. Input from practitioners, local government officials, and staff members of community-based organizations will help ensure that the Web-based learning center is relevant to the needs of prevention practitioners. Phase I investigated the feasibility of the proposed products by creating product prototypes and conducting appropriate needs assessment, feasibility, and usability studies to assure the products' user-friendliness and commercial appeal. Phase II will complete the development of all three products, conduct a second round of usability tests, field test the products in university (Products 1 and 2) and HIV/AIDS prevention program (Product 3) settings, and revise them to be maximally useful to their intended audiences.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

104 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1984–2016). Reported award amounts total $36,800,895. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services, National Science Foundation, Department of Education

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.