SBIR/STTR Research Award

Active Bottle for Home Care of Dysphagic Infants

Award identifier 3f31303f89f8c3475609ea3100be61c0b144b06835f5f06585bac9e69449bf89Awarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$141,595

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2005

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
Infoscitex Corporation
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
NJM7E3Y9QXJ5
Solicitation number
PHS2005-2
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): An active infant feeding bottle is proposed for home care feeding of dysphagic infants to promote coordination of sucking, swallowing, and breathing during oral feeding. Neurogenic dysphagia among infants is characterized by difficulty with active transport of liquid to the mouth and stomach. During oral feeding, these infants are prone to aspirating fluid into the lungs, and are therefore at risk of pneumonia. Once discharged to home care, these children are likely to return frequently for outpatient treatment of their chronic feeding problems. Ultimately, the proposed active bottle will precisely dispense milk during bottle-feeding, based on measurements obtained from onboard sensors, encouraging the child to maintain an "optimum" feeding pattern. The intent of the bottle is to achieve more effective and better individualized home care treatment for each child and, hence, to reduce the dependence on hospital care. The incremental direct medical costs of low birth weight in the first year of life in the U.S. exceeded 4 billion dollars in 1988, accounting for 35% of total health care costs for infants. Furthermore, serious health consequences may result if these feeding problems persist once infants are discharged to home, including malnutrition and impaired intellectual growth. A reduction in number of hospital visits associated with oral feeding difficulty could substantially reduce health care costs and perhaps reduce the risk of later feeding-related health problems. The Phase I will necessarily focus on development and test of the home care active bottle, whereas in Phase II we will conduct human clinical trials to determine its safety and efficacy. The Phase I will consist of design and construction of an active bottle system prototype; bench testing in the laboratory of the prototype to confirm the necessary performance of each of the components of the system; and system testing in which representative sensor data (from past measurements on children) will be input to the control computer and the response of the system observed. We conclude with a planning task necessary to begin testing with infants during a Phase II.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

210 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1986–2013). Reported award amounts total $64,528,765. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Health and Human Services, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Homeland Security, Environmental Protection Agency, Department of Agriculture

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.