SBIR/STTR Research Award

Bat Signal Processor

Award identifier 348f30f290f37bcd9b2a831dc34ada42b9c1219ddf877874c82fcd78900f65bcAwarding agency Department of Defense · Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency

Award amount

$102,257

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

1994

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
Recipient company
ORINCON
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
CCNUWJRVK5N5
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

Both the bat and the dolphin use high frequency sonar to locate prey. Although these systems are radically different, both require the reception and processing of short duration signals. In recent years, understanding of both the bat and dolphin sonar systems has increased dramatically through the efforts of university and government researchers. Additional progress in parallel computer architectures and neural network processing has now made the design of a bat or dolphin signal processor and classifier feasible. As a result, ARPA now desires the development of such a system consisting of a sonic receiver, signal conditioner, signal processing algorithm and a neural net realization of either the bat or the dolphin. Their intent is to study the echoes produced by both real animals and artificial means to gain insight that might result in either military commercial spin-offs. Our proposed Phase I research will focus primarily on bat biosonar processing because of the availability of more extensive neurophysiological data. We will evaluate candidate processing schemes using simulated bat signals and compare the resulting high-level bat system designs with requirements for dolphin processing. The sonar of the mustached bat will be used to develop a detailed desig the receiver, signal conditioner, processing algorithms, and neural network. Procurement specifications for prototype components will be prepared and all efforts will be documented. Phase II efforts will produce a prototype sonar system based on the Phase I design for the mustached bat and evaluate this system through laboratory and field testing. Results of the evaluation will be documented. ORINCON is uniquely qualified to develop this bat signal processor and classifier because of its extensive signal processing, active sonar, and neural network experience acquired on various ARPA Navy programs and its innovative RIPPENtm software and PRIISM hardware to which can be rapidly brought to bear on this problem. Anticipated Benefits/Potential Applications - Potential military applications include improved acoustic echo localization/classification for undersea mine detection/classification, unmanned underwater vehic

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

176 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1987–2003). Reported award amounts total $32,730,414. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Energy, Department of Transportation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Science Foundation

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.