SBIR/STTR Research Award

Gel-forming Systems for Adhesion Prevention

Award identifier 7b052bb4c8f0367fda113200fc53aa3fbd4da381e8d717657f8bd7c4d5849704Awarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$100,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2001

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
POLY-MED, INC.
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
L67LQ9NBEMB7
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

DESCRIPTION (Verbatim from the Applicant's Abstract): Adhesion formation after abdominal surgery is a significant cause of post-operative morbidity. In gynecological surgery, adhesions can lead to infertility, chronic pain, and obstructive disorder. Numerous adhesion prevention adjuvant have been investigated, most of which are based on a pharmacological agents or protective barriers. However, no systematic studies have been conducted to determine the combined effect of a transient barrier and pharmacological agent using a local, controlled release system. This provided an incentive to conduct comparative studies on controlled release systems based on unique transient barriers containing previously tested pharmacological agents or potentially effective ones. Phase I objective is to determine the feasibility of using gel-forming, hyaluronic acid/calcium acetate aqueous solution and no aqueous absorbable liquid co polyester as transient barrier matrices to control release of pharmacologically active agents for preventing post-surgical adhesion. Phase I plans entail (1) identifying and synthesizing fast absorbing liquid gel-forming co-polyesters; (2) preparing and conducting comparative rheological studies on hyaluronic acid Ca acetate (HA/CaAc) and liquid copolyesters as candidate matrices for controlled drug release, (3) formulating, the selected (HA/CaAc) and liquid copolyesters with selected pharmacological agents; (4) validating, and conducting a pilot study on three rat models for evaluation of three types of post-surgical adhesion, (5) conducting' the main study and using the results to identify two promising formulations for a Phase II study This will entail (1) completing a comprehensive in vivo studies using three animal species; (2) selecting one final system and completing pertinent development and scale-up studies; and (3) initiating the safety study. PROPOSED COMMERCIAL APPLICATION: Successful completion of Phase I study will provide the bases for pursuing a Phase II study and eventual development and marketing of a unique, highly effective system for managing key post-surgical complications associated with several procedures. This will not only benefit patients, but also reduce the cost of healthcare.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

24 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1996–2014). Reported award amounts total $4,327,056. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Defense, National Science Foundation, Environmental Protection Agency, Department of Agriculture

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.