SBIR/STTR Research Award

Chemoprotectants for Head-Neck Therapeutics

Award identifier 3aeef879632254253c281d861ab5951bdaea553341e5beca0e4f6560e1806774Awarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$252,860

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2009

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
REACTION BIOLOGY CORPORATION
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
LDBCLKM4WJH1
Solicitation number
PHS2009-2
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): Chemoprotectants for Head-Neck Therapeutics Oral mucositis occurs as a major dose-limiting and complicating side effect of chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or combined chemo/radiotherapy. It is considered the most significant complication of head and neck cancer therapy. Oral mucositis is accompanied by tremendous pain and can cause life threatening complications. Dysfunction in swallowing following laryngeal cancer therapy can be particularly debilitating. The development of chemoprotectants is the central goal of this Phase I proposal. In preliminary studies, Reaction Biology Corporation has completed three separate high throughput screening (HTS) campaigns for small molecular regulators of cellular survival. Three specific aims are proposed: (1) validation of hits in cell culture; (2) hit-to-lead chemistry program to advance the most promising chemistries; and (3) testing of compounds in cell lines for radiotoxicity. Such compounds will be used topically or by direct injection and do not require traditional oral activity and therefore may deviate to some degree from classic Lipinsky and ADMET constraints. Since chemotherapy and radiotherapeutic approaches are dose-limited due to off-target toxicity, the use of cell survival promoting agents during cancer treatments may offer several benefits to patients. PUBLIC HEALTH RELEVANCE: Chemoprotectants for Head-Neck Therapeutics Oral mucositis occurs as a major dose-limiting and complicating side effect of chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or combined chemo/radiotherapy. It is considered the most significant complication of head and neck cancer therapy. Oral mucositis is accompanied by tremendous pain and can cause life threatening complications. Dysfunction in swallowing following laryngeal cancer therapy can be particularly debilitating. Even though apoptosis is considered the central theme in oral mucositis, little work with caspase inhibitors has been conducted to date. Reaction Biology Corp. has developed a few novel, potent and selective caspase inhibitors and would like to evaluate their cell death protection activities in radiation induced apoptosis assays. The potent chemoprotectants will be further optimized and evaluated in mice models in next phase study.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

17 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2002–2017). Reported award amounts total $9,663,550. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.