SBIR/STTR Research Award

Enzymatic Metallography for Ultrasensitive Biodetection

Award identifier 7113f6929cc1f6c1c1592284ad4543e86e3420d6e5ec3c3cda39f5d4db829811Awarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$751,554

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2005

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
NANOPROBES INC
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
JK7BK6JL14M6
Solicitation number
PHS2005-2
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): A novel process has been discovered in which an enzyme linked to an antibody or biological targeting agent directed to a site of interest deposits metal rapidly and highly selectively from solution. Sensitivity and resolution are both higher then with alternative technologies, sufficient to visualize single gene copies and enumerate low copy number targets such as unamplified genes in the brightfield light microscope without oil immersion. Background binding was virtually non-existent. Signal resolution and clarity are very high even at the macromolecular level, and preliminary studies indicate that this method also provides high cell and tissue penetration for electron microscopy immunolabeling. Variations of this method will now be optimized for four different applications with different requirements. For immunohistochemistry, the process will be refined for highest specificity and reproducibility, then validated in comparison with conventional organic chromogens in an extensive two-center study. 20 commonly used immunohistochemical analytes will be stained in a series of 100 cases, using 10-core tissue midiarrays. For DNA and RNA in situ hybridization and Southern Blotting, enhancements will be pursued to maximize sensitivity: the enzymatic metallation will be accelerated by incorporation of a gold particle, and the method combined with polymer-based signal amplification methods. It will then be evaluated for the in situ hybridization detection of cyclin D1 mRNA in mantle cell lymphomas, and for the Southern Blot detection of clonal B and T cell gene rearrangements in lymphomas, in each case in comparison with autoradiographic and chemiluminescent methods. Enzymatic metallography will also be adapted for use in electron microscopy labeling. The method will be optimized to give highest specimen penetration, signal uniformity, and control over signal size and shape. Following screening in test systems, the new reagent will be critically evaluated against both conventional colloidal gold probes and against covalent gold cluster and nanoparticle probes in electron microscopic studies to characterize the distribution and function of different proteins in developing microsporidia spores.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

47 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1991–2025). Reported award amounts total $12,102,185. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services, National Science Foundation, Department of Energy

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.