SBIR/STTR Research Award

Polarized Xenon Production: Powerful Narrowed Laser

Award identifier 08810e3a5d7b10fb036b0011ef43ab11f2b0adc37720e5dd61e5c50ff1536f1bAwarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$99,905

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2005

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
XEMED LLC
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
YJ8MJGAAWGM7
Solicitation number
PHS2005-2
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): Both hyperpolarized xenon and helium have demonstrated utility in lung imaging and quantifying lung disease. In contrast to helium, however, hyperpolarized xenon has a high solubility in fluids and tissues and a characteristic chemical shift, revealing its microscopic environment in dissolved-phase imaging. An imaging protocol to investigate dissolved-phase imaging in humans could beneficially utilize several breath holds of roughly one liter each of highly polarized gas. The UNH group has developed a new type of xenon polarizer that flows the gas mixture at relatively high velocity and low pressure along a direction opposite to the laser beam, producing polarization of over 50% for small quantities and 20% for a production rate of over four liters per hour. The figure-of-merit (polarization times production rate) of this polarizer presently exceeds all other polarizer technologies by an order of magnitude. The 500 torr operating pressure represents a compromise between higher laser absorption (at higer pressure) and faster spin-exchange rates (at lower pressure). Our numerical simulations indicate that output magnetization scales with absorbed laser power, that is, power within a narrow range around the spectral absorption band. Our research group recently commissioned a 115W laser with narrowed O.Snm spectral linewidth, the world's brightest laser at 794.7nm. We request STTR funding to further develop and commercialize high-power spectrally narrowed lasers for spin-exchange optical pumping of hyperpolarized gas. For Phase I we intend to scale up this spectrally narrowed laser technology to over 400W, install it on a suitably adapted xenon polarizer, and confirm that magnetization output is increased at least 4-fold. For Phase II we will increase efficiency and decrease size by theoretical and experimental optimization of the cavity; characterize the performance of individual components and the full laser; develop supply channels with vendors; engineer mechanical stability and adjustability; determine operational limits; and document safety. We can then commercially offer narrowed lasers from 100W to perhaps as high as 800W for spin-exchange polarization of both helium and xenon.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

31 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2004–2020). Reported award amounts total $18,233,125. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Energy, Department of Defense

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.