SBIR/STTR Research Award

Interactive E-Learning for Therapist Training in Exposure Therapy

Award identifier b87024950582b1c9d10e2bb558edd00572a33a7d2dc2d68457a4f7ed643cc875Awarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$442,074

Program and phase

STTR · Phase I

Award year

2025

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
PARC INNOVATIONS LLC
Proposal award date
2025-04-16
Contract end date
2027-03-31
UEI
UB85SZ5KYVX7
Solicitation number
PA23-233
Topic code
104

Research abstract

PROJECT SUMMARY/ABSTRACT Despite the existence of numerous well-established evidence-based practices (EBPs) for mental disorders, it has been difficult to disseminate these practices in community settings. Exposure therapy for anxiety disorders represents one of the most glaring examples of this research-to- practice gap. Many practicing therapists have never had the opportunity to receive training in exposure therapy and cite this as a primary barrier to its delivery. To address this gap, we need to rethink the way in which we train providers. Over the past 10 years, our team developed and empirically validated a suite of exposure therapy training modules through multiple NIMH-funded studies. In keeping with the evidence base, these modules place a heavy emphasis on active learning components. Accordingly, they are time-consuming, costly, require live delivery by experienced trainers, and are inflexible due to scheduling constraints. Recent advances in e- learning offer an exciting opportunity to automate both the didactic and interactive components of these evidence-based training modules–an approach that has potential to vastly improve scalability, thus addressing a primary barrier to accessing the most potent treatment available for anxiety. In this project, we will develop and initially test an automated eLearning approach for therapists learning exposure therapy. We will leverage evidence-based training content and strategies from our prior work, as well as recent advances in eLearning (e.g., adaptive eLearning). The proposed Phase I STTR study will take place in three stages. Stage one (Development) is a nine-month development period during which PARC Innovations will build an alpha version of the training program in accordance with specifications from the research team and early input from a Multi-perspective Advisory Panel (MAP). The MAP (N=8) will consist of professionals with expertise in commercialization, education & e-learning, and/or technology. In Stage two (End- User Feedback and Optimization), a group of clinician end-users (N = 8) will interact with the platform and provide quantitative and qualitative feedback that will be synthesized by the research team into action items for further development. In stage three (Training Trial), therapists (N=40) will complete 8 hours of e-learning training (self-paced) over three weeks. Usability and training outcomes (e.g., therapist knowledge, self-efficacy) from this pilot trial will support a Phase II STTR project aimed at building out and broadly disseminating this eLearning approach.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.