SBIR/STTR Research Award

Enhancing follow-up rates through a Rechargable Incentive Card (RIC) System

Award identifier 56bbad52140a482b2d6c6a50dfbe67604f28ba969285d2fe210d2808a8bf2780Awarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$99,914

Program and phase

STTR · Phase I

Award year

2009

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
CALANCE CORPORATION
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
Not reported
Solicitation number
PHS2009-2
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): For longitudinal field studies involving substance abusers, successfully tracking, locating, and following up with a representative sample of subjects is a challenge. One meta-analysis of 85 longitudinal studies of substance abuse clients found that nearly one-third of subjects were lost to attrition within 36 months (Hansen, Tobler, and Graham, 1990). This poses a significant threat to the validity of findings in the substance abuse (and related) fields, as follow-up rates below 80% have been shown to produce dramatically biased estimates of drug use and crime (Nemes et al., 2002). The purpose of this Phase I Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) proposal is to develop a national network that supports a rechargeable incentive card (RIC) system designed to enhance follow-up rates. Specifically, the RIC System will involve a debit card linked to an account in which researchers can immediately transfer funds following a follow-up contact (whether this involves telephone or in-person interviews, mail-in surveys, or provision of biological samples). The card will also contain a toll-free number that subjects can use to call (as often as once a month) to notify the researchers of changes in their locator/contact information. This, too, will result in an automatic transfer of funds to the subjects' RIC System account. Developing this technology will require collaboration between the Calance Corporation and the UCLA Integrated Substance Abuse Programs (ISAP). Together, we propose to conduct a feasibility study of the RIC System, a survey comprised of a national sample of NIH-funded substance abuse researchers, and a pilot version of the accounting/tracking software and on-site card-generating machines. The proposed project will have strong commercial potential, as it will address the common problem of low follow-up rates in field studies, and there is evidence that this approach could yield rates 30 percentage points higher than those currently typical in studies of itinerant populations (Des Jarlais et al., 2005). PUBLIC HEALTH RELEVANCE: With a current annual budget of over 1 billion, NIDA supports approximately 85% of the drug abuse research conducted worldwide. It is critical that these studies of long-term drug use patterns and treatment outcome achieve follow-up rates of at least 80%. Estimates of trends or outcomes based on studies with lower follow-up rates can be invalid and misleading. Therefore, this project directly affects public health by creating a product that improves the validity and generalizability of longitudinal substance abuse research, leading to a better understanding of the nature of drug use and how best to treat it.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.