SBIR/STTR Research Award

Performance evaluation of a non-invasive menstrual test for endometriosis in infertility patients

Award identifier 812b5c956131411a3f812d51413b4f47e2b8bb29497f0da0047128cc24f1db8eAwarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$759,944

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2025

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
NEXTGENJANE INC
Proposal award date
2025-04-15
Contract end date
2028-03-31
UEI
EWN3LW7S8NP5
Solicitation number
PA24-245
Topic code
NICHD

Research abstract

Summary Endometriosis is a complex disease that on average, involves a ten-year gap between symptom onset and diagnosis, with profound consequences on fertility outcomes. Moreover, due to the current surgical nature of endometriosis diagnosis (laparoscopy), research studies involving confirmed cases are both difficult to obtain and costly to recruit for. Laparoscopic surgery (recovery times 2-6 weeks) followed by histological confirmation is considered the gold standard for diagnosis. However, even with surgical intervention, 50% of patients have recurrence, underlining the fact that endometriosis shows periodic states of activation, regardless of surgical or therapeutic intervention. Consequently, a non-invasive, reliable biomarker test for endometriosis is a significant unmet medical need. A non-invasive diagnostic for endometriosis would motivate earlier detection of disease and could fundamentally change a patient’s prognosis by preventing disease progression. Menstrual fluid is a rich source of reproductive tissue that can be utilized for disease diagnosis. NextGen Jane has developed a menstrual effluence collection system, which addresses issues of non-invasive sample accessibility and ease of sample transport to a laboratory. Toward commercialization of a reliable test to aid in the diagnosis of endometriosis among patients with infertility, our preliminary data has produced a high-performance genomic assay for the detection of endometriosis. We have performed initial testing of this assay on an independent dataset of 65 participants (38 cases and 27 controls) with high performance (an area under the curve AUC of 0.89). These factors alongside the demonstrated utility of our collection system differentiates this proposal from other non-invasive approaches to detection of endometriosis. Our goal is to commercialize this non-invasive” yes/no” diagnostic tool by performing the validation studies within the intended-use population of subfecund patients, as well as evaluate how well the assay performs when adenomyosis and fibroids are also present, which represents other leading causes of infertility.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

3 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2020–2025). Reported award amounts total $2,537,619. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase II, Phase I

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.