SBIR/STTR Research Award

Large-format Spatial Light Modulators for Shaping High Power Lasers

Award identifier c9bc387de91c11ef699f960717fa503b88505ea4a07d49c52ad70066619edaffAwarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$1,099,985

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2025

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
MEADOWLARK OPTICS, INC.
Proposal award date
2025-04-14
Contract end date
2027-04-13
UEI
U5N4FTKYGVR4
Solicitation number
DE-FOA-0003462
Topic code
C57-28b

Research abstract

Laser plasma accelerators and associated light sources, including high brightness x-ray generation through Compton backscattering, offer the potential for transformative applications in science, industry, medicine, homeland security, and future particle colliders. The beam power and efficiency of such systems is limited by our ability to correct for phase imperfections during amplification. Liquid Crystal on Silicon (LCoS) Spatial light modulators (SLMs) have the millions of pixels of phase control and >100 Hz speeds required for phase correction, but are currently unable to handle the average powers, fluences, and beam diameters of current and next generation kW-class lasers. MLO already manufactures the largest and highest frame rate SLMs in the world. Building on this experience, we will build new large-area SLMs that can handle average powers at the few kW-level and energy densities of 250 mJ/cm2 for 30 fs pulses. Our strategy will use a combination of efficient active cooling, custom liquid crystal, improved construction, and increasing SLM size to reduce peak fluence and average power density. Phase I: We redesigned our 17 mm x 17 mm SLM for high-power applications, changing the heat dissipation path as well as nearly every material that makes up the SLM. We found that early versions of our design were already able to operate at 400 W average power, the highest laser power we had available in Phase I. Phase II: We will test our Phase I design at higher average powers, and project that it will likely be able to operate at 1 kW average power. We will concentrate additional material development on the components that our Phase I experiments revealed had the lowest damage thresholds. Once we have our final material design tested on the 17 x 17 mm SLM, we will transfer the design to our 30.7 x 30.7 mm SLM. The SLMs developed in this work will find a broader market in laser manufacturing, where SLMs can produce custom beam profiles that can improve the efficiency of laser-based additive manufacturing, laser welding, and laser marking for aerospace and medical applications. Long-range communications and defense applications are also target markets for this design, which can be adapted for wavelengths from visible to mid-wave IR.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

17 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1989–2025). Reported award amounts total $8,154,217. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Energy, National Science Foundation

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.