SBIR/STTR Research Award

Development and Preliminary Validation of an Amphibian Lifecycle Test Method for Monitoring Endocrine Disruption

Award identifier a443172a6ced39d22d3984c932268b0cf1ca6f120e94fe829a48f1f894fc3c17Awarding agency Environmental Protection Agency

Award amount

$70,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2003

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Environmental Protection Agency
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
Fort Environmental Laboratories, Inc.
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
Not reported
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

Concerns regarding both the presence of endocrine disruptors in food, water, or other environmental media as well as the potential risk they pose to humans and wildlife have been growing in recent years. Passage of the Food Quality Protection Act and Amendments to the Safe Drinking Water Act reflected these concerns and required the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to develop a screening program, using appropriate validated test systems and other scientifically relevant information, to determine whether certain substances may have an endocrine effect in wildlife and humans. This research project will result in the validation of an assay that tests substances that might disturb reproductive and developmental processes during the lifecycle of animals by interfering with the endocrine system. The primary goal of the proposed research is to standardize, validate, and commercialize an amphibian lifecycle model using Xenopus as a system for evaluation of endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) found in the workplace or the environment. Specifically, Fort Environmental Laboratories, Inc., will standardize and validate an X. tropicalis assay designed to evaluate the effect of EDCs on various aspects of the amphibian lifecycle by conducting studies with a series of known mammalian EDCs, compounds found to be inactive, and chemicals with unknown activity. Because none of the currently developed EDC test systems are capable of specifically addressing lifecycle effects in amphibians and the Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program developed for EPA by the Endocrine Screening and Testing Committee, the successful completion of this amphibian lifecycle model will provide the scientific community with a non-mammalian, cost-effective, rapid, reliable method of prescreening EDCs. The ability to rapidly and cost-effectively screen for and evaluate the mechanisms of EDCs is an attractive alternative to the current laborious and expensive testing systems used today. Increasing concerns over the widespread finding of EDCs in the environment have dramatically increased the need for standardized assays, such as the Xenopus lifecycle model, because no other assay of this type is available today. Current estimates indicate that nearly 50,000 chemicals in the United States may require EDC testing with models such as the amphibian lifecycle assay. Overall, this volume of work has the potential of generating approximately $125 billion during the next 10¿15 years. Realistically, it is anticipated that based on the high volume of work generated by this need for cost-effective testing of chemicals, revenue of more than $5 million could be generated during the next 2 years, and more than $25 billion during the next 10 years.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Agency intelligence

Environmental Protection Agency

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.