SBIR/STTR Research Award

Evaluation of a low-fluoride anticaries toothpaste containing an innovative calci

Award identifier 270c620383fb36a024f700871cd846e29f45d744dafe7c7778566264d1b1bf42Awarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$204,777

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2010

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
Indiana Nanotech, LLC
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
FB9CHGBHAU97
Solicitation number
PHS2010-2
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): A recent clinical research report on children found that over a two-year period although there was no statistical differences in anticaries benefits between two groups using either 1000 ppm F or 400 to 550 ppm F toothpastes, there was a directional trend of caries incidence increasing with lower fluoride toothpastes. Nevertheless clinical data demonstrate caries progression increases over time when lower fluoride toothpastes are used. The same research report discussed above also found the prevalence of dental fluorosis was dramatically higher for users of a 1000 ppm F toothpaste compared to users of toothpaste containing between 400 and 550 ppm F. Separately, adults not wishing to use a normal over-the-counter (OTC) level of fluoride but still desiring the same, if not better, anticaries benefits in a product having less fluoride do not currently have an efficacious option. This continues to be a very sensitive issue among the general population as well as scientific researchers, and in fact there exists an entire peer-reviewed journal (Fluoride) that contains many publications on the ill-effects produced by fluoride. Until an effective alternative is found, such contention and debate will continue. Simply increasing the level of fluoride in an oral delivery system, such as toothpaste, is not the answer, especially if one considers the potential risks of dental fluorosis. As such, there is an opportunity to provide anticaries benefits without compromising the health of the dentition. Published studies reveal that multi-mineral treatments, including fluoride, calcium, and phosphorous can act synergistically to provide enhanced levels for protection compared to single mineral treatments. With over 95% of the US population brushing their teeth daily, toothpastes are the most widely used and accepted form of topical fluoride treatment. In order to reduce potential dental fluorosis risks without compromising anticaries benefits, the development of a multi-mineral toothpaste formulation that contains lower levels of fluoride (i.e. ~ 500 ppm F) relative to existing OTC fluoride toothpastes may be possible if other fluoride-compatible tooth-building minerals could be included in the formulation. Such a formulation would be targeted specifically for children and adults as a safe and effective alternative to create significant value and provide a significant public health benefit. Indiana Nanotech has patent-pending technology for a unique fluoride-compatible functionalized tricalcium phosphate (fTCP). By building on our current knowledge, experience, and success with the fTCP technology, in this SBIR Phase I proposal we seek to determine the feasibility of formulating a low fluoride plus fTCP toothpaste that provides anticaries efficacy at least as good as an established OTC fluoride toothpaste. We have partnered with a leading FDA-approved and cGMP compliant dentifrice manufacturer and a renowned university to address the following Specific Aims: 1) Formulation of three toothpastes: fluoride-free (placebo); one with 500 ppm fluoride; one with 500 ppm fluoride plus fTCP; 2) Execution of laboratory studies that include a battery of FDA-recommended laboratory studies, including fluoride bioavailability, enamel fluoride uptake, and white-spot lesion reversal via remin/demin cycling.; and 3) The clinical evaluation in a double-blind cross-over in situ clinical study. PUBLIC HEALTH RELEVANCE: Clinical data demonstrate caries progression increases over time when toothpastes are used containing lower levels fluoride relative to that found in over-the-counter (OTC) toothpaste (~ 1100 ppm fluoride). But children and adults not wishing to use OTC toothpaste but still desiring at least the same, if not better, anticaries benefits from a toothpaste having less fluoride do not currently have an efficacious option. In order to reduce potential dental fluorosis risks without compromising anticaries benefits, the development of a multi-mineral toothpaste formulation that contains lower levels of fluoride (i.e. ~ 500 ppm F) relative to existing OTC fluoride toothpastes may be possible by combining Nanotech's innovative fluoride-compatible tooth-building minerals could be included in the formulation. Such a formulation would be targeted specifically for children and adults as a safe and effective alternative to create significant value and provide a significant public health benefit.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

5 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2007–2018). Reported award amounts total $1,042,156. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.