SBIR/STTR Research Award

EGFR Peptides as Vaccines in Anti-Tumor Immunity

Award identifier 62672871413a08af877ef83f1a0ccdbc134097209f747046c4d24b405a4894f9Awarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$277,711

Program and phase

STTR · Phase I

Award year

2007

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
L2 DIAGNOSTICS LLC
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
GKA7VH5LFR25
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): The focus of our in Phase I studies is the development of a novel peptide-based vaccination strategy designed to overcome immune tolerance to Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) tumor antigen. The direct correlation between EGFR expression and the severity of tumor development makes this surface protein an important target of therapy. Indeed, EGFR is overexpressed in a majority of solid tumors including colon cancer, breast cancer, head-and-neck cancer, non-small-cell lung cancer, bladder carcinomas, gliomas, kidney cancer, renal cancer, and ovarian cancer. EGFR is a 170-kDa transmembrane glycoprotein of the erbB family. Similar to other proteins in this family, such as Her-2, EGFR consists of an extracellular receptor domain, a transmembrane region, and an intracellular domain with tyrosine kinase function. The existing EGFR-specific therapies are inhibitors of the tyrosine kinase signaling functions and the monoclonal antibodies, Erbitux and Panitumumab, directed at the EGFR protein. Antibody therapy has been observed to be synergistic with traditional chemotherapy. These expensive therapies are administered to patients on a continuing basis until unresponsiveness of the tumor is observed. Our proposal will examine the ability of selected peptides of the EGFR protein to break immune tolerance and inhibit EGFR-tumor cell growth. Our preliminary data from the use of both EGFR and Her-2 peptides support the efficacy of this approach. In phase I studies: 1. We will utilize cryptic and modified EGFR peptides for immunization and examine the development of both anti-tumor B and T cell immune responses. 2. We will assess the ability of anti-tumor immunity to prevent growth of human and murine EGFR-bearing tumor cells in vitro and in vivo. Our work will utilize a mouse model to compare the anti-tumor responses of Erbitux antibody therapy with Erbitux to the polyclonal antibody responses elicited by EGFR peptide vaccination. The studies will potentially provide a novel and easily applied therapeutic strategy to be used alone or in combination with traditional chemotherapies that can elicit long term anti-tumor immunity in an efficient and cost effective manner.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

84 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1999–2025). Reported award amounts total $45,551,124. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Defense

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.