SBIR/STTR Research Award

Adaptive Daylighting Systems

Award identifier 66596b079df8e6a3cfd457a73883c6b670241788598f6198f935787b689dc377Awarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$74,981

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

1997

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
Aspen Systems, Inc.
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
LT1KKS59LJ48
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

81 Adaptive Daylighting Systems--Aspen Systems, Inc., 184 Cedar Hill Street, Marlborough, MA 01752-3017; (508) 481-5058 Mr. Glenn Demming, Principal Investigator Mr. Hamed Borhanian, Business Official DOE Grant No. DE-FG02-97ER82334 Amount: $74,981 There is a need to promote the design and development of products or systems that utilize passive solar energy in combination with energy efficiency features to significantly reduce the need for conventional energy sources. The increased use of Structural Insulated Panel (SIP) roof systems presents an opportunity to develop integrated products that will provide high quality daylighting, heating contributions when desired, and cooling load avoidance when necessary. This project addresses this opportunity through the development of a novel skylight that will admit diffused solar radiation into the building in varying amounts depending on sun angle. As a result, daylighting is provided in a more even manner throughout the day and year than with conventional skylights. Passive solar heating is also enhanced during periods when it is desirable and much of the high angle summer-sun is rejected, thus providing cooling load avoidance. The novel adaptive daylighting system to be developed will utilize passive glazing technologies having no moving parts or external power source. A highly insulative translucent aerogel material will be incorporated into a matrix structure and sealed between two layers of glazing that provide an overall R-value more than five times that of a standard double glazed window. The Phase I program will include whole building modeling and testing of glazing samples to optimize the design parameters. The Phase II program will include full scale prototype development and testing. Commercial Applications and Other Benefits as described by the awardee: The adaptive daylighting system developed in this program will provide high quality daylighting to building interiors. During times of low incident radiation transmittance will be increased, and energy will be saved in operative lighting and heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning systems. While the initial market for this product would be for use with new SIP roof systems, retrofit and conventionally constructed buildings will also benefit.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

118 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1985–2012). Reported award amounts total $26,951,408. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Energy, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Science Foundation, Department of Transportation, Department of Homeland Security

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.