SBIR/STTR Research Award

EXPRESSION OF ANGIOGENIC GROWTH FACTORS IN KERATINOCYTES

Award identifier c79348d0883ed9185edf56d680edb5a3d45a7c8a7ea956955eb724b8827b02a4Awarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$100,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2002

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
Stratatech Corporation
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
WE88ZJ5AY3F9
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

The goal of these studies is to provide a genetically-improved cultered skin substitute product for use in the treatment of burns and chronic wounds. The current products include wild-type keratinocytes or fibroblasts in collagen-based or artificial matrixes. Genetic analysis of the wound healing process revealing specific growth factors that promote angiogenesis during wound healing. Temporally-regulated expression of these factors may promote vascularization and may facilitate the vascularization of skin grafts. Our working hypothesis is that human keratinocytes that express angiogenic growth factors will provide improved healing of burns and wounds of humans keratinocytes that express angiogenic growth factors will provide improved healing of burns and wounds on humans in the context of a cultured skin substitute. A key technology to test this hypothesis is the availability of a human cell line called NIKS(TM) that forms fully stratified skin equivalents in culture that are indistinguishable from those formed with primary human keratinocytes. We propose to inducibly express angiogenic growth factors in NIKS(TM) keratinocytes and demonstrate that NIKS(TM) cells expressing these factors can form fully stratified organotypic cultures that secrete these factors in biologically-active forms. In Phase II, we will test the genetically-modified NIKS(TM) organotypic cultures for enhanced vascularization in animal models of wound healing. PROPOSED COMMERCIAL APPLICATIONS: In the United States it is estimated the 1.25 million people need medical care for burns each year. Approximately 51,000 people are hospitalized for burns and 13,000 require skin grafts. Of these, 1,500 are severely burned and require extensive grafting. With respect to skin ulcers, it is estimated that 800,000 diabetics in the United States suffer from chronic, non-healing diabetic foot ulcers. In addition to diabetic ulcers, new products are needed for venous ulcers, and pressure ulcers (bedsores). Several products employ bioengineered skin substitutes; Genzyme's Epicel, Advanced Tissue Science's Transcyte and Dermagraft, LifeCell's Alloderm and Organogenesis' Apligraft. These products currently are not as effective as split thickness autologous grafts, which remain the method of choice for the treatment of full-thickness skin loss.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

36 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2001–2015). Reported award amounts total $24,528,236. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Defense, National Science Foundation

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.