SBIR/STTR Research Award

UHT Ceramic Yarn Manufactured From Silicon Carbide (SiC) Fibers

Award identifier 1efc5ab62e0974cd1a571ab5fa632cbf290a3c0a4645dc2c2add072ca40167e5Awarding agency Department of Defense · Navy

Award amount

$899,996

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2025

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Navy
Recipient company
ADVANCED CERAMIC FIBERS, L.L.C.
Proposal award date
2025-04-08
Contract end date
2026-10-08
UEI
WE9NMNL1ZNB6
Solicitation number
23.1
Topic code
N231-072

Research abstract

The ACF team is focused on developing and deploying a manufacturing process in which SiC/C fibers are fabricated into yarns capable of integration into traditional weaving or braiding systems used to produce high strength, high temperature ceramic matrix composites (CMCs). Yarns of short discontinuous SiC/C fibers originating from Stretch Broken Carbon Fibers (SBCF) will be key to this effort. ACF’s unique conversion process demonstrated in Phase I is not limited to SiC/C materials and is projected to accommodate other high temperature materials such as ZrC/C and Ta/C fibers and other base carbon fibers (PAN, Pitch, CNT) available from different source (see 3.0 Letters of Support).  Using ACF’s conversion process demonstrated in Phase I, the manufactured yarn will have sufficient strength to interface with various weaving and braiding processes used in the construction of 2D, 3D and the more complex 4D CMC preforms and textiles. In addition, ACF’s unique MC/C yarns also incorporate a unique  intrinsic interfacial debond layer that eliminates the costly interfacial coating process thereby allowing direct ceramic yarn fiber manufacturing use in composite materials. Composite materials can also include various carbides and boride matrix composite ceramics and fiber use  metals, i.e.  aluminum and titanium.  ACF’s four major PII objectives are: (1) Produce a prototype system capable of kilograms / hour for SiC/C yarn with scaled improvements to include the manufacture of advanced ZrC/C and TaC/C based yarns for UHT applications; (2) Iterate/refine the manufacturing process to improve efficiency and yarn quality while concurrently expanding the lab scale capability to make specialty SiC/C yarns with different strength, thermal, modulus and electrical properties; (3) Conduct trial runs designed to connect fiber characteristics with the manufacturing process and the through mechanical testing, imaging, and analysis with our team members MSU (test & analysis) and CPP (marine & HT corrosion); and, (4) Provide specific SiC/C yarns in kilogram spools to SSP Navy for testing and evaluation of the processes. As portions of this effort may be classified, all work shall be conducted under SSP guidance. ACF Phase II includes a 24-month (BASE – 18 month and OPTION 6-month.)

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

11 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2014–2025). Reported award amounts total $6,959,481. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Energy, National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.