SBIR/STTR Research Award

Wearables, Biomarkers, and Performance Recovery

Award identifier 455282e80dcadfb777b9d5f696ed0cc25d48fdad7a369dfd3dc0a66e74be9fc9Awarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$1,249,999

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2025

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
LYNNTECH INC.
Proposal award date
2025-04-03
Contract end date
2027-07-06
UEI
PMVAL8J63516
Solicitation number
22.1
Topic code
AF221-0018

Research abstract

Stress and fatigue experienced during active military training, during combat and while working in complex environments (aircraft cockpit, carrier flight deck, air traffic control, etc.), can lead to lapses of attention, reduced reaction times, and loss of impulse control. Commanders have limited options available to identify individuals experiencing cognitive decline and have minimum access to appropriate countermeasures. Thus, there is a substantial need for new technology to recognize and counteract performance decline in individuals while they carry out critical operations. We propose to develop a closed loop wearable system to continuously measure an individual’s performance indicators, identify performance decay, and automatically deliver enhancement agents for performance recovery. Ability to function independent of human intervention, favors use of the device in operating environments lacking easy access to medical resources. We have successfully carried out a Phase I SBIR to identify favorable bioengineering options for a closed loop system for delivery of performance enhancement agents according to measurements of a person’s stress/fatigue status. As part of the Phase I, we identified preferred subsystems and components that show high levels of technological maturity and made a down selection to create a preliminary design. During Phase II, an engineering design that informs how to integrate both sensing and augment functionalities into an automated device will be developed, resulting in the fabrication and testing of a closed loop prototype. Potential for a successful Phase II outcome is supported by the investigators’: (1) access to existing sensor concepts and hardware for detecting a variety of biomarkers; (2) on going experience developing proprietary drug infusion technology; (3) connections to experts in wearable devices technology; and (4) access to complementary firmware/software physiological monitoring solutions that we have integrated into equipment used in training of military pilots.  These factors favor rapid transition to a low cost, low risk closed loop device in Phase III. There are significant private sector commercial opportunities for the proposed device.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

1,079 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1988–2025). Reported award amounts total $327,411,388. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Health and Human Services, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Energy, National Science Foundation, Environmental Protection Agency

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.