SBIR/STTR Research Award

Improved Dehydration Process for Pharmaceutical Synthesis

Award identifier f4cd6909a7917b0beca996e319d0a3d420a6ca77225c30ab49bcb55c5bd0762fAwarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$128,500

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2006

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
COMPACT MEMBRANE SYSTEMS, INC.
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
JDNRH32DML47
Solicitation number
PHS2006-2
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): Most pharmaceutical synthesis involve condensation or dehydration reactions at some point in the process that generates water as a by-product. This water must be removed since (1) water is often not a desirable component of the finished product, (2) water limits conversion to final product, and (3) water generated slows the reaction rate. Many Pharmaceuticals have thermal limitations and therefore removing the water by boiling it off is simply not attractive due to product degradation. Membrane reactors have been proposed for a number of pharmaceutical syntheses. To be competitive with conventional technologies, membrane reactors must be shown to have better selectivity, permeability and stability and ability to perform at lower temperatures. Compact Membrane Systems (CMS) has identified a novel product concept that represents a broad platform for utilization of membrane reactors in pharmaceutical synthesis. Preliminary economic and engineering analysis shows that removal of water will significantly increase yield (literature shows 33%) and therefore lower reagent consumption. Further, the desired product downstream separation and purification can be dramatically simplified. Therefore, enhanced water removal reduces production costs in these ways: higher yield, faster reaction and purer product. This enhanced manufacturing process is consistent with the Federal Initiative on Broad Manufacturing Enhancements to strengthen the United States Competitive Position. While many systems can be used in Phase I to demonstrate the feasibility of the product concept, we will focus on an appropriate model system. In Phase I we will first fabricate membrane reactor and then demonstrate enhanced performance. This will be followed by long term testing and economic analysis. CMS has established key industrial relationships with major membrane companies, material suppliers, chemical synthesis companies and key end users. These relationships will help CMS in successfully completing Phase I and II of this program and most importantly subsequent commercialization. Overall market opportunity is seen as very large related to broad pharmaceutical utilization in many synthesis.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

218 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1993–2021). Reported award amounts total $55,705,610. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Energy, Department of Health and Human Services, Environmental Protection Agency, Department of Agriculture, National Science Foundation, Department of Defense

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.