SBIR/STTR Research Award

Development of an Electromyographically Controlled Electrolarynx Voice Prosthesis

Award identifier 2a1c303757cf6010d97da868b87494ca113c5a58bb4b0400a8425da02e2de575Awarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$100,000

Program and phase

STTR · Phase I

Award year

2010

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
GRIFFIN LABORATORIES, INC.
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
Not reported
Solicitation number
PHS2010-2
Topic code
NIDCD

Research abstract

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): The most common artificial voice source for post-laryngectomy speech rehabilitation is the hand-held buzzer or electrolarynx (EL). This device is relatively easy to use and enables most laryngectomees to verbally communicate, but with reduced intelligibility and markedly degraded naturalness. In addition, EL speech is often described as robotic and monotone, attributable largely to the lack of normal fundamental frequency (F0) variation/control, abnormal voice source timing (e.g. voice onset and offset controlled by a thumb button) and abnormal spectral characteristics (e.g., reduced energy below 500 Hz). Previous research has demonstrated that neck surface electromyographic (EMG) signals can serve as an intuitive and effective control source for EL voice onset/offset timing and F0 modulation. The goal of this project is to develop an effective, practical, and user-friendly EMG-EL that can provide improved control over voice source timing and F0 for more intelligible and natural-sounding EL speech. The Phase I specific aims are 1) Produce a prototype wireless EMG sensor appropriate for EL control; 2) Integrate wireless EMG signal reception and processing circuitry into a hand-held EL; and 3) Evaluate the prototype EMG-EL through testing with laryngectomy patients experienced in EL use. Assuming successful prototype development in Phase I, work in Phase II will further refine the EMG-EL by 1) Optimizing the control scheme of F0 and onset/offset from neck surface EMG signals; 2) Determining which device parameters are appropriate for user adjustment which should be set by the clinician guiding speech rehabilitation; and 3) conducting extensive user testing of the device with iterative adjustment of its form and function based on user performance and structured feedback. PUBLIC HEALTH RELEVANCE: The most common voice prosthesis used after total laryngectomy is the hand-held buzzer or electrolarynx (EL), but EL speech typically lacks pitch variation and precise timing control, giving it a highly unnatural sound quality with reduced intelligibility. Previous research has shown that pitch variation can significantly improve EL speech, and that neck muscle electromyographic (EMG) signals can be used as an intuitive control source for controlling EL vocal intonation and timing (onset/offset). The objective of this project is to develop and test an EMG-controlled EL that can be offered commercially to improve the communication and therefore lives of thousands of EL users.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.