SBIR/STTR Research Award

Diagnostic for Age-Related Macular Degeneration

Award identifier 16fe4a0dfa87bd1b14983ed5358e63490b2a240958e3e3afa480b8aa08c5318fAwarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$519,121

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2007

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
APELIOTUS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
DD9JNFB8AW88
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): This is an SBIR Phase II proposal directed at the continued development of a diagnostic for the early detection of age-related macular degeneration (AMD). It relies on a functional test of dark adaptation kinetics (the transition from being light-adapted to being dark-adapted) that has been shown in previous work to detect the onset of AMD at least four years before it is clinically evident. Testing is completely non-invasive and can be performed by an unskilled operator with a minimum of patient burden. Our Phase I aim was to demonstrate feasibility by building a preliminary prototype diagnostic that could distinguish AMD patients from normal old adults in = 20 minutes. This aim was easily achieved. A range of early to late AMD patients was readily discriminated from clinically normal old adults in = 20 minutes. The difference was both substantial (~100% dark adaptation impairment for AMD patients relative to normal old adults) and statistically significant (t = 6.02; p < 0.0001). Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were 88% and 100%, respectively, with the degree of dark adaptation impairment tracking disease severity. Finally, there is promising pilot data for follow-on development of a commercial AMD screening test that can be completed in = 10 minutes. Our Phase II aim is to build a robust commercial prototype and evaluate the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity for detection of early AMD in a cross-sectional study of 200 patients (50% normal old adults; 50% having a range of early to intermediate AMD). Our goal is sensitivity and specificity = 90% with a test duration = 10 minutes. The University of Alabama at Birmingham and Johns Hopkins University will serve as clinical test sites. Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the leading cause of blindness for individuals in developed countries over 50 years old. It already affects more than 13 million people in the US, including one-third of those over 75, and the problem is expected to get worse as the population ages. Unfortunately, there is no simple means for early detection. A diagnostic for early AMD could aid in the development of early-stage treatments and identify individuals for intervention before the devastation of late-stage vision loss.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

5 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2005–2009). Reported award amounts total $1,090,657. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.