SBIR/STTR Research Award

Novel fetal heart monitor technology

Award identifier db8d2923c94b688bb93e6dc1dcdf6597cb2a633c062106dcb34e6c5261c46e6fAwarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$99,963

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2005

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
Bioconnexions, LLC
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
Not reported
Solicitation number
PHS2005-2
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): Significant progress has been made in the science of electrocardiography since 1938. Heart rate and biophysical profiles are routinely derived from multi-lead electrocardiograms (ECGs) in animals and humans after birth. In contrast, only limited heart monitoring technologies exist for the fetus. Moreover, available technology fails to satisfy many existing needs in fetal ECG monitoring, both to support fundamental research on fetal development, and for clinical assessment of fetal health. This grant application proposes to reduce the technology gap that persists in fetal ECG monitoring in order to support advanced assessments of fetal health and development. The goal of this technology is to 1) monitor the fetal condition in an objective, quantitative, and non-invasive manner by enabling continuous and highly specific data collection during pre-natal development and the intra-partum period, 2) aid in the fetal and maternal treatment planning regimen potentially earlier than presently feasible, thus facilitating or indicating interventions which may reduce maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality, 3) maximize the health and well-being of the mother and fetus by reducing unnecessary or ineffective interventions (e. g., unnecessary C-sections) and the number of babies born with effects of such interventions, and 4) support fetal development research. Specific aims are directed to the refinement and validation of the technology for the purpose of prototyping a device that is fully automated, requires no user intervention, and produces a relevant quantitative output in real time. The specific aims of this Phase 1 effort include: 1) automating and optimizing the existing signal processing parameter controls by eliminating current requirement for certain operator decisions ("man-in-the-loop") during processing, and 2) designing a robust and clinically acceptable data collection interface to the patient by optimizing the data collection hardware configuration. This research will serve to further the experimental technology advanced in the existing research by providing the capability to collect transabdominal fetal ECG data without multiple, individually applied electrodes, making such monitoring valuable as a commercial application and more accessible to the research community. In addition, the proposed instrumentation will overcome existing limitations in accuracy resulting from data averaging to extract the maternal ECG. In this regard, the development of the new fetal heart rate technology not only has significant commercial potential, but offers the research community new tools to assess fetal health and fetal development.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.