SBIR/STTR Research Award

Development of RLIP767 as a Radiation Countermeasure

Award identifier 797ff3c96787c448aef3665683ebc637a626a79bc42b33c71c22cb4d42b75151Awarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$559,128

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2009

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
TERAPIO
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
Not reported
Solicitation number
PHS2009-2
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): A major instigator of radiation-induced pathology is cellular damage caused by reactive oxygen species formed in the first moments after exposure. Most therapeutic agents are free radical scavengers which must be present in high concentrations as exposure occurs, making their use as treatments problematic. In addition, the normal cell already has scavenger molecules present, such as glutathione. Glutathione accepts electrons from reactive electrophiles as part of the normal cellular defenses, but the resultant electrophilic glutathione conjugates still pose a threat to cellular integrity. Final elimination of risk then requires the transport and elimination of these reactive glutathione S-conjugates - a key function of RLIP76, a membrane-associated transport protein. Terapio has been testing RLIP76 as a systemic therapy for high-dose radiation poisoning. Preliminary studies in mice show that increasing cellular content of RLIP76 by systemic administration significantly increases survival even if the protein is administered AFTER radiation exposure, with a clear dose-response relationship between amount of RLIP76 administered and survival that extends to all but the highest exposure levels. Further, RLIP76 can be orally administered, increasing its ease of treatment. In order to move forward with clinical development, additional work regarding protein storage, stability, optimal dosing and schedule of administration is necessary. Further, although much is known about the protein's mechanism of action on a cellular level, organ-specific effects have yet to be determined. Therefore, this proposal will focus on three main areas. Specific Aim 1 will look at the stability of the protein under a variety of storage conditions to determine loss of activity and how that may affect recommended dosing in the field. Expanded studies of in vivo stability of the protein will be performed by following tissue levels of administered protein over time. Specific Aim 2 will enlarge understanding of the relationship between dose level, timing and schedule of administration and length of treatment in a mouse model. Specific Aim 3 will look at how RLIP76 affects specific organ toxicity from radiation and examine potential long term effects, again in a mouse model. The information obtained is necessary to plan an optimal treatment regimen for RLIP76 under different radiation release scenarios. PUBLIC HEALTH RELEVANCE: RLIP76 is a naturally-occurring protein that can be given orally and counteract the effects of radiation poisoning even if given AFTER exposure occurs. This project will investigate the most effective dosing of the protein and how to optimize packaging for long term storage.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.