SBIR/STTR Research Award

Simultaneous Removal of Arsenite As (III) and Arsenate As (V) From Drinking Water Using a Novel Photoactive Adsorbent

Award identifier fc59e30f88c9cfb0863a08ccff5b9896f1a97485df9041628c9a0623854a0e7aAwarding agency Environmental Protection Agency

Award amount

$99,996

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2003

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Environmental Protection Agency
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
MICROPOROUS OXIDES SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY LLC
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
DX1WKMDT9XN5
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

With the maximum contaminant level for arsenic in drinking water decreasing from 50 ppb to 10 ppb in 2006, a heavy financial burden will be placed on small water-treatment facilities serving less than 10,000 people. At present, adsorption on activated alumina is preferred for removing arsenic in these small facilities because this process has relatively low capital costs and low operating expenses. However, adsorption processes employing activated alumina require a pH between 5.5 and 6.0 for optimum arsenic removal. Because these pH values are outside the pH range at which most water treatment plants operate (pH between 6 and 8.5), most plants install a separate pH adjustment unit before the adsorption process. This pH effect is likely due to the adsorption of arsenate or other protolyzable anions on the activated alumina, which lowers its isoelectric pH (IEP) from 8.2 to approximately 5.5 to 6. Although this effect will occur with most adsorption media, materials having higher IEPs than activated alumina have higher arsenic adsorption capacities at pH values typical of drinking water. Another concern with arsenic removal is treating arsenite, which is uncharged at the pH of drinking water and so is difficult to remove by adsorption or ion exchange. Processes for removing arsenite typically oxidize arsenite to arsenate and then adsorb the arsenate. Use of a TiO2 photocatalyst has been shown to significantly accelerate the photooxidation of arsenite. Recent studies in the laboratory of Professor Anderson at the University of Wisconsin have shown that both arsenic species can be removed in a photocatalytic adsorption process using a novel thin-film material. In addition, because this material has a higher IEP than alumina, it is not necessary to adjust the pH of the removal process. These new materials not only adsorb both species equally well but have significantly higher capacities for removing arsenic than activated aluminas. In this research project, Microporous Oxides Science and Technology will select an appropriate substrate for these thin-film adsorbents and obtain data to demonstrate that this process is not only superior to present arsenic removal systems, but competes favorably with other systems in cost while treating other types of contaminants (e.g., the photocatalyst mineralizes most organics to CO2, water, and mineral salts, and may photoplate heavy metals on the photocatalyst). By placing these thin films on optical wave-guide delivery systems, and by using a unique pulsed UV light source furnished by Novatron, Inc., that will likely destroy pathogens such as Cryptosporidium, it should be possible to develop a commercially viable, cost-effective drinking water treatment system for small and mid-sized communities.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Agency intelligence

Environmental Protection Agency

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.