SBIR/STTR Research Award

Evolving Onboard/Offboard Electronic Warfare Technology

Award identifier 1246af9b2d49a39da465029a6d29b1c3584d5ba641301f113907f8b2ad412374Awarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$1,471,440

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2001

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
MACAULAY-BROWN, INC.
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
Z6USGD96KM25
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

The capability to precisely locate and identify radio frequency (RF) threats in real time is critical for warfighter system of systems environments that utilize multiple sensors. Developmental radar warning sensors such as the Precision Location andIdentification (PLAID) and special receiver collection systems determine precise threat location or identify by making extremely accurate parameter measurements of Doppler/phase shifts, angle-of-arrival (AOA), and time difference of arrival (TDOA).Open-air ranges cannot provide dense emitter environments, nor the controlled, repeatable conditions essential for valid and affordable testing. Current DOD laboratory testing facilities and commercial simulations cannot simulate all the detailed, finegrain signal characteristics required to effectively test PLAID technologies. Innovative simulation concepts are required that can generate appropriate RF signal modulations with an accuracy/resolution exceeding the measurement capability of PLAID sensors.This Phase II SBIR will develop and build a creative design concept called the Advanced TDOA, AOA, and Phase (ATAP) threat simulation that addresses the critical technology challenges of testing PLAID sensors. A prototype ATAP system, as designed in thePhase I will be fabricated and demonstrated in the AFRL/SN Integrated Demonstrations and Applications Laboratory (IDAL). Phase II will result in a simulator prototype single channel design, that is readily expandable into a multi-channel system withpotential applications as a commercial product. ATAP will have a high payoff by reducing development risk and testing cost by enabling rapdi prototyping of hardware design and softeware algorithms in a controlled environment. ATAP is adaptable tocommercial Automated Test Equipment (ATE) applications to test Air Traffic Control Systems, Microwave Landing Systems (MLS), cellulat telephones, Global Position (GPS), and VHF/UHF communications. It is also useful as a commercial tool for testing ECM/ESMsystems in aircraft (B-2, F-15, F-22, etc.) integration laboratories. With high gain amplifiers and antennas, ATAP has applications in open air range testing, and EW combat simulation and training.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

22 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1985–2001). Reported award amounts total $5,089,741. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense

Contractor profile

HII MISSION TECHNOLOGIES CORP

Historical federal award activity, when published, is on that contractor profile. Matched by UEI only.

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

NAICS intelligence

This classification comes from the contractor profile, not from the SBIR award record.

Contractor industry classification NAICS 541512

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.