SBIR/STTR Research Award

Fiberoptic Personal Exposure Monitor for Diisocyanates

Award identifier b70a8f9d55163ce62eda6bea33124a3adaccfc0508c74b0fdc499de3bf133b27Awarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Award amount

$71,165

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2007

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Recipient company
LIGHTLINE TECHNOLOGIES INC
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
LXCTLPJZGV25
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): / Abstract Spray-on polyurethane coatings applied during auto body repair expose workers to potentially harmful levels of diisocyanates. Workers also commonly risk exposure to harmful vapors during the manufacture of mo lded polyurethane foam products. Diisocyanates have been identified as the major cause of occupational asthma. LightLine Technologies proposes to develop a highly sensitive fiberoptic personal monitoring device, similar to a sampling badge, targeted for th e simple and convenient measurement of diisocyanate airborne exposure. A chemically reactive coating applied to the fiber will provide a direct integrated response to all diisocyanate vapors during exposure. This compact, battery powered device will monito r exposure in real-time and provide rapid, low cost, feedback to the user of unhealthy exposure levels that are recorded and reported via digital electronics. Humidity and temperature compensation will be integrated into the device so as to make exposure m easurement more accurate. An explicit program goal is to make the device size and cost suitable for consistent use during typical auto body repairs and factory operation. A differentiating version of the fiber sensor will provide for a separate measurement of aromatic diisocyanate exposures. Diisocyanates are highly toxic, used worldwide, and produced on a very large scale for the production of polyurethane and related chemical products. Since most human exposure occurs as the chemical vapors are transporte d by air, an air sampling based method having high sensitivity is required. Current measurement methods fail to provide adequate sensing of all diisocyanate species simultaneously. The anticipated results of the SBIR program will be to: 1) Determine an opt ical fiber based sensor fabrication process, use procedure, and real-time readout process that provides high sensitivity and high confidence evaluation of diisocyanate vapor species in air. 2) Design, build and test a prototype personal exposure sensor and readout package that accurately provides sensing capabilities for human exposure determination in industrial environments.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

8 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2000–2014). Reported award amounts total $2,044,383. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, Environmental Protection Agency, Department of Health and Human Services, National Science Foundation

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.