SBIR/STTR Research Award

Transient Analysis and Control of Scramjet Isolator Flowfields

Award identifier 956abefa0b563aa6e3dc6ff0db083cb8ece785881fe6a7b7484d71478a452399Awarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$99,698

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2003

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
TAITECH, INC.
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
UEEJCEAMLYF5
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

This SBIR will investigate the use of bleed slots to control shock wave/turbulent-boundary-layer interactions within the isolator of a scramjet engine. A successful control strategy for shock wave motion can prevent inlet unstart and lead to the design ofa shorter isolator yielding reduced system drag and weight. The optimal location and size of the bleed slots will be determined using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) employing Reynolds-averaged Navier Stokes (RANS) methods. The effectiveness of thebleed design will be demonstrated over a range of Mach numbers, boundary layer displacement thicknesses and effective back pressures. The bleed slot design will be tested experimentally and the required mass removal rate to achieve the desired performancewill be quantified. CFD will also be used to determine the time scale associated with the shock train movement due to changes in the back pressure. The information will assist the development of an active control system for shock stabilization that will bea major part of the Phase II effort. For the design of scramjet engines, the development of effective isolators to contain the pressure rise generated by heat release within the combustor is critical. The proposed Phase I control device employing bleedslots can be used to build innovative designs for reducing the risk of inlet unstart, while decreasing the overall system drag and weight associated with long isolators. In addition, CFD analysis can provide time-accurate prediction tools to facilitate thedesign of efficient isolators and guide the development of lower-order prediction tools that can be used for isolator design in a more cost-effective manner.The control devices and analytical tools to be developed in Phase II of the proposed research program will provide very attractive alternatives to those currently in use or being considered for military and commercial use. Moreover, the control device willbe applicable not only to scramjet engine isolators, but also to other parts of the engine such as over-contracted inlets. The commercial strategy is to market the design tool to both military and commercial aircraft customers. All major airframe andengine manufacturers, e.g., Boeing Company, Lockheed-Martin, GE Aircraft Engines, and Pratt-Whitney, should be potential customers.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

27 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1993–2009). Reported award amounts total $6,915,192. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Science Foundation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.