SBIR/STTR Research Award

Development of a cationic contrast agent for targeted imaging of glycosaminoglyca

Award identifier 480ccf056efb89128ef59f52097a7db457f5a7f2de486ca239046148107073cbAwarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$224,475

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2013

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
IONIC PHARMACEUTICALS, LLC
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
K51MT3XNKME7
Solicitation number
PA12-088
Topic code
NIAMS

Research abstract

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): There is no known cure for Osteoarthritis (OA), a debilitating disease that afflicts 27 million people and costs 125 billion, annually. In OA, the articular cartilage is degraded and it has a limited capacity to self-heal; therefore, rendering a diagnosis at a late stage is ineffective at preventing further cartilage degeneration. Currently, there are no contrast agents that are specifically designed for quantitative CT imaging of glycosaminoglycan (GAG) content in articular cartilage. Ionic Pharmaceuticals is developing a novel cationic CT contrast agent for targeted quantitative imaging of changes in GAG content and morphology of articular cartilage. Recent data demonstrates that the cationic contrast agent (CA4+) is five times more sensitive at imaging ex vivo and in vivo articular cartilage than currently available commercial anionic contrast agents. This superior performance of the cationic contrast agent is attributed to the electrostatic attraction between the cationic contrast agent and the negatively-charged GAGs present in articular cartilage. Two critical steps towards commercialization of this technology and the use of this contrast agent in the clinic are addressed in this proposal: 1) synthetic scale- up, analytical and formulation development; and 2) pharmacokinetics. Thus, the specific aims of this proposal are: Aim 1: Larger scale (~200 g) synthesis of CA4+, development of analytical methods, and formulations for future pre-clinical safety, toxicology, andpharmacokinetic studies. Aim 2: Synthesis of the C14 labeled contrast agent and pharmacokinetics of C14- CA4+ (plasma-time course, routes and rates of excretion and tissue distribution) after IV and intra-articular dose in rats. PUBLIC HEALTH RELEVANCE PUBLIC HEALTH RELEVANCE: Sensitive imaging technologies for monitoring changes in osteoarthritic cartilage are urgently needed. Currently, there is no known cure or a sensitive imaging method that can be used to diagnose osteoarthritis at an earlystage. This SBIR Phase I proposal furthers the development of a new cationic CT contrast agent for quantitative imaging of cartilage, by manufacturing it on a large scale and determining its pharmacokinetics.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

9 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2013–2024). Reported award amounts total $5,464,060. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.