SBIR/STTR Research Award

Multidisciplinary Optimization of Naval Ship Design and Mission Effectiveness

Award identifier db685fe641892689fa2b6414a43e1d4ce618f6139303af365dfadc2eab81b221Awarding agency Department of Defense · Navy

Award amount

$69,939

Program and phase

STTR · Phase I

Award year

2003

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Navy
Recipient company
Technosoft, Inc
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
FKLYV5GNJ5D8
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

The iterative nature of ship design and the conflicting requirements of multiple disciplines present a challenge to find the best combination of design parameters to balance mission effectiveness with cost and risk. An engineering framework is proposed,integrating ship synthesis and design analysis tools, and employing multidisciplinary optimization and probabilistic design methods for modeling and simulation of design concepts. The underlying object-oriented architecture supports distributed computing,dependency tracking, demand-driven computation and parametric modeling. The framework supports a visual environment enabling the users to integrate the relevant software tools and to define the variables, constraints, and objectives for trade studies,optimization, and design exploration.A prototype version of the framework will be developed and exercised in the assessment of ship design concepts in collaboration with a partner university and a ship design center. Ultimately, the system significantly enhances the overall engineeringprocess of evaluating potential design concepts for optimization and trade studies. The development of the proposed architecture will result in a visual and modular engineering framework that will provide maximum interoperability among application software used in various disciplines and permit design exploration and optimization.The successful development of this framework will reduce ship design development time and cost, enabling quick response to fast-paced advancements in new ship systems and technologies. The U.S. Navy will benefit from the framework through the selection ofthe best alternatives to attain the mission objectives in future naval programs by design exploration. The shipyards can rapidly develop new designs from concept to the validation stages as the framework capitalizes on the legacy tools currently used inthe industry, while adopting new methods for design optimization.After a successful Phase II project, TechnoSoft will produce a software product based on the proposed framework, and market it as a part of its product offerings. Together with its current customers and partnering shipyards, TechnoSoft will deploy thesoftware in shipbuilding industry. The payoff for the US Navy and shipyards will be substantial from the rapid-to-market design development and reduced engineering cost.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

26 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1993–2015). Reported award amounts total $10,355,510. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.