SBIR/STTR Research Award

CARDIONICS, INC.

Award identifier 37986e950b1e05365e39cfb8a42aa44a3b3e74740998a7b1f90dabec951e000bAwarding agency Department of Health and Human Services

Award amount

$50,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

1985

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
Cardionics, Inc.
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
Not reported
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

CARDIONICS, INC. OF HOUSTON, TEXAS IS CURRENTLY PROVIDING A RELATIVELY INEXPENSIVE PORTABLE PULSED DOPPLER (PD) ULTRASONIC UNIT THAT NONINVASIVELY MEASURES CARDIAC OUTPUT (CO) IN HUMANS. USING THERMODILUTION AS THE INVASIVE STANDARD FOR CO DETERMINATION, THIS STUDY WILL COMPARE THE RELATIVE RELIABILITIES AND ACCURACIES OF THE PD DEVICE (CARDIOFLO) AND A COMMERCIALLY AVAILABLE CONTINUOUS WAVE DOPPLER UNIT (CWD) (ULTRACOM). 1. TO DETERMINE WHETHER THIS SIMPLE NONINVASIVE DEVICE CAN ACCURATELY AND RELIABLY MEASURE CO AND 2. TO INVESTIGATE POSSIBLE DESIGN IMPROVEMENTS THAT CAN BE INCORPORATED INTO A SUBSEQUENT MODEL. WE WILL ADDRESS THE RELATIVE ACCURACIES OF SEVERAL METHODS OF OBTAINING AND PROCESSING DOPPLER SPECTRAL SIGNALS. QUADRATURE OUTPUTS WILL BE RECORDED AND SUBSEQUENTLY ANALYZED THROUGH COMPUTER-BASED FAST FOURIER TRANSFORM (FFT) AND ANALOG OFFSET ZEROCROSSER (ZC) UNITS. PAIRED COMPARISONS WILL BE: 1. PD VS. CWD; 2. BASEBAND ZC VS. FFT; 3. BASEBAND ZC VS. OFFSET ZC; 4. ANALOG OR DIGITAL INTEGRATION OF THE ENTIRE CARDIAC CYCLE VS. LEFT VENTRICULAR EJECTION PERIOD ONLY; 5. ANALOG TEMPORAL MEAN OF CONSECUTIVE CYCLES VS. OPERATOR SELECTED CYCLES. PHASE II OF THIS STUDY WILL INCORPORATE THE RESULTS OF PHASE I INTO AN IMPROVED CARDIOFLO UNIT WHICH SHOULD HAVE WIDESPREAD COMMERCIAL APPLICATIONS IN CLINICAL AND RESEARCH SETTINGS WHERE CO IS NEEDED BUT THE COST AND RISKS OF TRADITIONAL INVASIVE METHODS ARE NOT JUSTIFIED.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.