SBIR/STTR Research Award

Preclinical Development of INO-4995 for Cystic Fibrosis

Award identifier 7ddba5bb315fcbb70ff9258aaffb577b2abe60c03b8b56cf389f529cc68ab161Awarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$814,155

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2005

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
ISM Therapeutics
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
Not reported
Solicitation number
PHS2005-2
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): Inositol signaling molecules (ISMs) have been linked to regulation of ion channels. Evidence indicates that an lnsP4, myo-inositol 3,4,5,6-tetrakisphosphate [lns(3,4,5,6)P4] and its analogs regulate CI- channels in multiple epithelia. While inositol polyphosphates are highly charged, making them unlikely to cross membranes, we have developed membrane permeant forms that enable intracellular delivery recapitulating the activity of endogenous inositol polyphosphates. These activities suggest that derivatives of inositol polyphosphates may be therapeutic in cystic fibrosis (CF) and other diseases characterized by abnormal ion flux. In contrast to extracellularly acting agents directed against the extracellular domain of ion channel pores, membrane-permeant inositol polyphosphate analogs modulate ion channel activities from inside the cell. We have identified an lnsP4 derivative, INO-4995, as a potential treatment for CF and have initiated development toward the filing of an IND. INO-4995 is selective for CF epithelial tissue as compared to non-CF tissue. The goal of the current study is to predict how INO-4995 functions in CF tissue and in different genetic backgrounds. This will aid in identifying and treating an optimal patient population most likely to benefit from the compound's therapeutic effects. The specific aims include: Aim 1: Assess the in-vitro cellular metabolism and the in-vivo pharmacokinetics of radiolabeled INO-4995. Aim 2: Assess the bioavailability and safety of INO-4995 using an epithelial airway tissue culture system. Aim 3: Determine the effects of INO-4995 on nasal transepithelial voltage of CF and non-CF mice under a variety of conditions, including genetic background, age, and gender. To date, work has been performed with tissue from deltaF508 homozygous CF patients. We will extend this work to assess the electrophysiological effects of the compound on tissue with other mutations or in tissue that is heterozygous for deltaF508. We will also compare the effect of the compound in deltaF508 homozygous mice on different genetic backgrounds. The broader aim of this study is to further characterize the biological responses to INO-4995, and in conjunction with the ongoing preclinical and clinical development program for CF, would offer further validation for the therapeutic utility of an inositol polyphosphate signaling molecule derivative. This work will help delineate the mechanism of action of INO-4995, will assess the bioavailability and safety, and will help define dosing/regimen protocols, and could expedite regulatory and clinical planning during the development process.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.